COVID Vaccine Mandaters Should Be Criminally Culpable For All Vaccine-Related Injuries

Townhall.com ^ | October 11, 2021 | Scott Morefield

[Kaslin]

The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) was established in 1990 and is managed by both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a way to collect information about harmful side effects potentially caused by vaccinations. It’s meant to serve as a sort of “early warning system” so healthcare professionals can pivot in the event a vaccine causes unforeseen damage to patients.

When this happens, and it occasionally does with all vaccines, the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) provides a claims procedure to potentially provide compensation for those who are injured. The law under which the VICP was created - the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) - also conveniently shields vaccine manufacturers from liability for their products. (I say “conveniently” because it’s certainly convenient for vaccine makers, but I also somewhat understand the logic, since vaccine makers would be hesitant to produce anything at all if they were held financially liable for anything and everything that went wrong even after FDA approval of their products.)

Of course, simply looking at VAERS data and assuming at face value that every single entry was directly caused by the vaccination in question is problematic for several reasons that begin with the fact that literally anyone, including patients and parents, can claim anything they wish. However, intentionally filing a false VAERS report is against Federal law and punishable by fine and imprisonment. Additionally, healthcare providers and vaccine manufacturers are also required to submit any adverse events they run into to the database. In other words, not every VAERS claim is some whack job insisting a vaccine turned him into the Incredible Hulk. Yes, that happened (the claim, not the metamorphosis). Some, if not most, of them are quite real.

Still, the vaccine cultists consistently use obviously wrong entries - such as the example of a woman in her 50s who died after a motorcycle accident but was incorrectly included in VAERS simply because she had recently received the Moderna coronavirus vaccine - to discredit all of them and give the impression, though they are careful to no longer specifically say it, that the Covid vaccines are ‘100% safe and effective.’

“All those reported deaths are not from the vaccine, instead, they are all reported deaths of people that got the vaccine,” reads this CBS report, the author of which is undoubtedly unaware of the ironic fact that Covid realists have been pointing this out about Covid deaths for almost two years. One thing doesn’t necessarily follow the other. However, sometimes it does. Sometimes people die FROM Covid, and sometimes people die FROM a vaccine. Sure, it’s more rare, but it happens, and indeed reports of adverse reactions to the coronavirus vaccines far exceed those from any other vaccine in modern history, to the tune of well over 6,000 deaths alone and many more significant adverse events such as myocarditis and Guillain-Barré syndrome. Not to mention the fact that we all doubtless know people who were knocked off their feet for several days to several weeks after their second dose of this supposedly “harmless” mRNA shot.

No medical treatment, vaccines included, comes without risk. That’s one key reason why, prior to the Covid era, society has generally avoided hard and fast vaccine mandates. And even when vaccines have been mandated, there have typically been easily obtainable exemptions. To lend some perspective, suppose you are the owner of a company with ten employees. You force your workers to get a vaccine, then one of them dies because the vaccine you required them to get reacts badly to a preexisting condition that worker unknowingly had. Sure, the odds were low that it would happen, but it did, and it happened to your employee. Would you feel guilty about that? I know I would, especially if I had mandated the vaccine to ‘fight’ a virus that posed little to no statistical risk to that employee.

As I’ve stated many times, it would be one thing if this were a super deadly disease, if the vaccines produced far significantly fewer side effects than these do, and if they actually were sterile, eliminating contraction and transmission. If there were another smallpox-like disease, for example, with a 30% fatality rate and a readily available vaccine that eliminated it, I suspect Congress and the president would have zero trouble passing a nationwide vaccine mandate instantly, and that it would hold up in court. You know, a real law rather than color of law and obscure regulations and leaning on private businesses to do their dirty work for them. What’s more, they probably wouldn’t have to, because 99% of Americans would probably be lining up and begging for the shot.

But sadly, none of that is the case here, is it? Instead, we’re stuck with a product that is showing itself to be increasingly inferior week by week. Already, the fact that Pfizer’s vaccine wanes significantly after just 6 months has made national news, and I suspect that’s just the tip of the coming iceberg. Given this shoddy performance, nobody in their right mind has any business forcing or coercing anyone else to get a potentially dangerous jab that only provides limited protection for the individual receiving it for a few months at best. It’s absolutely insane, yet it’s where we are right now. And please, don't insult my intelligence by saying people aren't technically being "forced" into taking the vaccine. When you threaten people's livelihoods, their ability to travel, and even their right to function normally in society, you are for all intents and purposes "forcing" them to acquiesce to your demands.

Should employees who suffer adverse side effects after being coerced into taking the shot by their employer claim worker’s compensation? Absolutely they should, and they generally will be on solid ground. But it’s deeper than that. In a just world, someone who causes someone else’s death, even indirectly, would face serious civil and even criminal penalties. In a just world, people forcing this shot on others who are then seriously harmed or killed would face a Nuremberg-style trial followed by swift justice after a guilty verdict. Am I saying that Covid vaccine mandaters should face prison time for their nefarious acts, which also include willingly and maliciously denying early treatment and cheap & easily obtainable medications to Covid sufferers until they are literally in a hospital bed on death’s door? Absolutely and unequivocally, yes, that’s exactly what I’m saying.

It’s one thing to recommend a medical intervention and even make the pitch that it’s better than the alternative, especially to those at-risk groups to whom the ‘alternative’ is grim. If people then willingly ‘buy’ it, they are assuming their own risk after having studied all possible outcomes. You know, ‘informed consent’ and all that. But when you delve into force and coercion, you are morally, and you should be legally, responsible for anything negative that ensues. Full stop.

Sadly, right now we do not live in a sane nor a just world, but these monsters fully deserve the justice that such a society would impose on them. They are evil, soulless ghouls, and they should be behind bars for the rest of their lives. Someday, if the world ever returns to sanity, perhaps they will be.

[Kaslin]

People with the Flu can aslo die by bleading to death. That happend to my father in 1975. He was in the hospital with the Flu. He needed the pot or the bottle and called the Nurses station to come and help him. But none of the nurses came. They had left the hospiatal. So he tore the IV out of his arm. The Hospital staff found him in the bathroom in the morning bled to death. He was only 62.

[Salamander]

:’(

[Travis McGee]

[Travis McGee]

That is a horrible tale. I’m so sorry to read it. Just horrible.

[Carl Vehse]

Perhaps Nuremberg 3.

Nuremberg 2 will deal with those responsible for genocidal abortion and associated crimes against humanity.

[FLvoter]

Make the specific decision makers criminally culpable if you really want to end this madness quickly.

[Jane Long]

Already, the fact that Pfizer’s vaccine wanes significantly after just 6 months has made national news, and I suspect that’s just the tip of the coming iceberg. Given this shoddy performance, nobody in their right mind has any business forcing or coercing anyone else to get a potentially dangerous jab that only provides limited protection for the individual receiving it for a few months at best. It’s absolutely insane, yet it’s where we are right now. And please, don’t insult my intelligence by saying people aren’t technically being “forced” into taking the vaccine. When you threaten people’s livelihoods, their ability to travel, and even their right to function normally in society, you are for all intents and purposes “forcing” them to acquiesce to your demands.

.....

Am I saying that Covid vaccine mandaters should face prison time for their nefarious acts, which also include willingly and maliciously denying early treatment and cheap & easily obtainable medications to Covid sufferers until they are literally in a hospital bed on death’s door? Absolutely and unequivocally, yes, that’s exactly what I’m saying.

....

Sadly, right now we do not live in a sane nor a just world, but these monsters fully deserve the justice that such a society would impose on them. They are evil, soulless ghouls, and they should be behind bars for the rest of their lives. Someday, if the world ever returns to sanity, perhaps they will be.

---

^^ THAT ^^

Entire article is spot on.

[tatown]

Thanks for the ping!

[Socon-Econ]

So let’s go back and prosecute the drill sergeants who pushed generations of recruits through vaccine lines on their way to the front. I’m sure a percentage of the shots went wrong.

[Osage Orange]

What?

[Tilted Irish Kilt]

Jane long :" Am I saying that Covid vaccine mandaters should face prison time for their nefarious acts, which also include willingly
and maliciously denying early treatment and cheap & easily obtainable medications to Covid sufferers until they are literally in a hospital bed on death’s door? "

We may, or may not be able to sue for liability of the vaccine manufacturers, but intimidation and coercion ,still remain as viable alternatives for a lawsuit.
Conspiracy to commit a crime, criminal facilitation, and aiding and abetting fraud, are still punishable criminal offenses which could be pursued.
Intimidation and coercion into taking an experimental medication (UEA) still is a violation of the International Nuremberg Accord, and could be prosecuted at "The Hague".

Criminal culpability could be pursued as the vaccine was erroneously proposed as a method of reducing hospitalizations,
but at what expense to the population ?
Court appearance wold go on for decades.
then you bring in the collusion between government (FDA/CDC) rewriting the definition of a vaccine ti fit this biological injection.

Then , you look into who justified the expense of $700.oo per shot after the government already subsidized the research,
resulting in a a negotiated price of $700.oo per shot of "the jab", times two shots(plus a possible "booster") versus the $17.74 cost for manufacture of each shot.
Then we get into the legal ethics of empowering Pfizer to realize a 4000% profit on their vaccine.

Then we get into the "Bait and Switch" of the FDA approving the Pfizer injection of "Comirnaty" vs. the Pfizer "jab" produced under UEA(Under Emergency Authorization).
The FDA and Pfizer are counting on both cowardice and ignorance by Americans for compliance into taking the regular "jab" for which there is no manufactures liability ,vs. Comirnaty which does have liability.
Both the FDA and Pfizer heavily advertized this approved "jab","Comirnaty", even though it is still the same UEA "spikevax" which doesn't have manufacturers liability.
Another fraud of misrepresentation, or "Bait and Switch" by the regime, FDA, and Pfizer, since Pfizer has a backlog of the UEA "jab".

Then you look at the Pfizer injection under UEA Also, "the jab" has been found to lose its efficiency at 5 months, thus requiring a subscription of additional "booster shots" at another $700.OO fee.
Also, recent studies have shown that people who have received two or more shots of "the jab" are the ones dying in hospital.
Also the jab was supposed to protect from symptoms for 9 - 12 months; however it is losing efficacy at five months, so there is reduction in price for the "booster", another $700.oo.
So, in conclusion I ask you, is a 4000% profit for the manufacturer justified for an analgesic that doesn't prevent, or cure, ...but does modify the symptoms.
Is it justified ?
Do all of these facts justify a criminal investigation and prosecution ?

[Jan_Sobieski]

Vaccines give the government an additional economic lever to manage the economy.

If our government allowed allowed for vaccine injury tort, it would be unable to reduce underfunded liabilities, therefore negatively affecting our economic system. Forced vaccinations will continue unabated.

[zeestephen]

Re: $700 per shot.

I have not seen that number before.

Do you know what cost - if any - is specified on Medicare and Medicaid statements?

Usually, those statements show the market price, followed by the price that Medicare and Medicaid actually pay.

[Gritty]

Re: $700 per shot. I have not seen that number before.

That's for Merck's new miracle pill that "replaces" Ivermectin (at ~$0.30 a pill).

The problem is, Merck's new offering apparently has bad side effects as well - unlike dirt cheap and widely available Ivermectin.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4001902/posts

In this case, "Ya pays yo' big money and ya take yo' big chances!".

[Tilted Irish Kilt]

zeestephen :" Do you know what cost - if any - is specified on Medicare and Medicaid statements?
Usually, those statements show the market price, followed by the price that Medicare and Medicaid actually pay. "

" For COVID-19 vaccines administered on or after March 15, 2021, additional doses of the COVID-19 vaccine
administered to immunocompromised individuals on or after August 12, 2021, and booster doses administered to certain populations on or after September 22, 2021,
the Medicare payment rates for administering the vaccines are:
Approximately $40 for single-dose vaccines
For vaccines requiring multiple doses, approximately $40 for each dose in the series, including any additional doses and booster doses

For COVID-19 vaccines administered before March 15, 2021, the Medicare payment rates are:
$28.39 for single-dose vaccines
For vaccines requiring a series of 2 or more doses:
$16.94 for the initial dose(s) in the series
$28.39 for the final dose in the series 

Source : https://www.cms.gov/medicare/covid-19/medicare-covid-19-vaccine-shot-payment
-----------------------------
Not exactly what you asked for, but related to the $700.oo per shot cost to the government :

"How much has the government spent on COVID-19 vaccines? USA Today reported that the government has spent more than $9 billion on development for the vaccines,
distributed amongst nine different companies.
Another $2.5 billion is going toward equipment, including storage vials and syringes, needed to administer the vaccines.

Source: http://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/how-much-will-covid-19-vaccines-cost-taxpayers/ar-BB1cnyy6

[Tilted Irish Kilt]

zeestephen :" Do you know what cost - if any - is specified on Medicare and Medicaid statements? "

In doing the research on Medicaid and Medicare reimbursements ,
I noticed that there is a different rate reimbursements for the Moderna shots.
As I recall, it was around $38. , which is significantly higher than Pfizer.

[JCL3]

Study to Describe the Safety, Tolerability, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of RNA Vaccine Candidates Against COVID-19 in Healthy Individuals

COMPLETION DATE: May 2, 2023
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04368728

Lab rats wanted! Now hiring “volunteers” with no recourse.

The Cormorbidity vex is not available in the USA and is the “approved one” with a slightly different formulation than the one currently causing problems(see link below, re-titled to avoid bad words).

The government did what it usually does: It made it worse, and those corporate arsonists who lapped up the government’s propaganda made it worse too and unlike the government they are not immune from lawsuit or worse.
https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=243859