Posted on 10/03/2021 9:28:08 AM PDT by Texas Fossil
Senator Ron Johnson, R-Wisc., claimed that the U.S. still doesn't have an FDA-approved vaccine as he exposed what was really approved by the government agency on "Fox News Primetime."
SEN. RON JOHNSON: We do not have an FDA-approved vaccine being administered in the U.S. The FDA played a bait and switch. They approved the Comirnaty version of Pfizer drugs. It’s not available in the U.S. They even admit it. I sent them a letter three days later going "What are you doing?" What they did is they extended the emergency use authorization for the Pfizer drug vaccine that’s available in the U.S., here that’s more than 30 days later, they haven’t asked that very simple question. If you’re saying that the Pfizer drug is the same as the Comirnaty, why didn’t you provide FDA approval on that? So, there’s not an FDA-approved drug and, of course, they announced it so they could push through these mandates so that people actually think, "Oh, OK now these things are FDA approved." They are not and again, maybe they should be, but the FDA isn’t telling me why.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Think of the scale of legal action?
I have seen this in the past and wondered why no one talks about it.
legally distinct products with insignificant differences.
They are just getting away with what they can get away with, while they can, is my take. This is the same as BLM, CRT and the “election”. There is no authority for any of this. Just jaw jackin’ from the “administration” and the “press”. Notice that Nancy and Chucky aren’t jumping in there with congressional legislation. OSHA regs? There is no legality for any of this, and when it is over, they’ll deny it ever happened.
Someone said it’s not licensed.
It is.
Stay on topic.
This is what Pfizer says about the vaccine and its new name:
Yes, it’s available in the USA!
"Comirnaty has the same formulation as the FDA-authorized Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine and can be used interchangeably to provide the COVID-19 vaccination series without presenting any safety or effectiveness concerns. The products are legally distinct with certain differences that do not impact safety or effectiveness."
It does not state that they are identical. The "same formulation" offers a lot of room, plus, they say the are "legally distinct with certain differences". Okay, what are they?
Source: https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/qa-comirnaty-covid-19-vaccine-mrna
Yep, it’s still under EUA.
https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download
Page 11, section Y:
Y. All descriptive printed matter, advertising, and promotional material relating to the
use of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine clearly and conspicuously shall state
that:
This product has not been approved or licensed by FDA, but has been
authorized for emergency use by FDA, under an EUA to prevent Coronavirus
Disease 2019 (COVID-19) for use in individuals 12 years of age and older; and
The emergency use of this product is only authorized for the duration of the
declaration that circumstances exist justifying the authorization of emergency
use of the medical product under Section 564(b)(1) of the FD&C Act unless the
declaration is terminated or authorization revoked sooner.
Where in the US is it available?
“The Pfizer mRNA vaccine is licensed for prevention of SARS CoV 2 infection for persons aged 16 and above, “
And if it is subsequently shown that the shot does —NOT— prevent infection, what then?
Is the license revoked?
“there truly is something evil going on” “How evil?”
Hubby and were JUST discussing this and concluded it’s a classic case of spiritual warfare. Basic good v. evil.
Not sure I’m understanding. Is Cominarty a brand name? Is it the same vaccine, but has different labeling, not approved in the U.S.?
really? where does it say that?
Hey TF, facts are not theories. ;D
Bill Gates has one thing....money.....and he’s not afraid to make demands with it and get what he wants.
Gates is just another geek with money...that hasn’t changed his geekiness. He’s still ugly and still a geek.
The players are very open about what they are doing.
He is evil. And serves great evil.
Evil yes...but Bill Gates serves himself entirely....though he loves notoriety and actively seeks it.
I thought this was already proven to be a myth.
No. And a 1985 law It made it so that no one can Sue a vaccine maker for damages. There’s a government agency that handles that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.