Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Sivana
Photography was rare, expensive and difficult at the time slavery ended in the states. I don’t see plantation owners having their slaves stay still for 10 minutes while the photograph was being taken while the photographer was there for family portraits.

4 million slaves. They had years to take pictures of any whipping scars, and they had Massachusetts abolitionists just scouring the world for proof to support their claims.

I suspect the truth is that this sort of abuse was extremely rare, and that the people trying to claim it was extensive and common, are liars.

343 posted on 10/12/2021 6:15:52 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
I suspect the truth is that this sort of abuse was extremely rare, and that the people trying to claim it was extensive and common, are liars.

Bingo. Scarred up slaves were worth less on the market. How many people do you know willfully damage their own property? Sure there are some people like that, but they are rare. This is a well known case of a particularly sadistic owner. That is of course why the picture was taken and used for propaganda purposes. Now watch the usual liars try to twist the factual statement that this kind of treatment was rare into "you're defending slavery!" These are the same kind of people who claim everything under the sun is "racist" today.

354 posted on 10/13/2021 2:46:06 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 343 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson