You need to read the entire article.
I couldn’t get past the first three lies they wrote.
>> You need to read the entire article.
To say the snarky antagonism in the excerpt is misleading?
I confess, I skimmed it and didn't find much in it I agreed with. The writer didn't think there was voter/election fraud in the 2020 election sufficient to swing the results to Biden (that is, Biden didn't win with counterfeit votes), and thought that the Republicans were dangerous anarchists willing to do anything by any means necessary to ensure a Trump win in 2024, even to the point of "overthrowing the government" or something.
In sum, it comes across as smug hysteria. That's how I read it.
Can’t.
Paywall.