Close your eyes. Now, imagine it was Stacey Abrams that had lost the election instead of DJT . . .
Arizona citizens need to liaison with citizens in those states...will make it easier for the legislators in those states if they have a groundswell, and harder for those legislators to continue to turn a blind eye.
Arizona’s fraud disenfranchises votes elsewhere as well-not just those votes of Arizonans. Fraud in one state impacts the vote nationwide-particularly if Congress in DC is very close to 50-50; a fraudulent state election with fraudulent House races and fraudulent Senate races can deprive the rest of the country of a representative Congress and allows the political,social and financial consequences of electoral and voter fraud to proceed unchallenged and unfettered-basically a “breeder reactor”.
A TRUE “national emergency”
It is for this reason the US Supreme Court has to get involved in this somehow. SC role-among others-is to mediate disputes between states.
Perhaps somehow the SC is the next stop for the Arizona audit data?
This crap can’t happen here in Ohio. Ohio’s machines have hard print of the ballot. When you finish making your choices on the screen the machine prints a record on a roll in the machine to read. You check the printed record to make sure it is correct. You can the either accept the print or reject it. This makes a permanent record that can’t be tampered with. Only out right destruction of the entire record will remove the record.
Legislation should be considered that would prohibit connecting tabulators, or the Election Management System Servers
or similar equipment from being connected to the internet or any other mechanism that could allow remote access to
these systems.
Furthermore, County employees should have access to all administrative functions of all election equipment and have
sufficient access to independently validate any configuration items on the device without requiring the involvement of
any 3rd party vendor.
These two findings are kinda funny because they match up with the review done in Fulton County, PA by Wake TSI
https://www.thethinkingconservative.com/election-assessment-in-pennsylvania-county-uncovers-five-issues-of-note/
According to the review Dominion actually did all of the election management for the county because no one in the county could work the software. It had to be connected to the internet because that is how they managed the election.