He is running for US SENATE.
Here is a summary:
9.24.21 1PM Az time. From Az State Senate Chambers
Presentation of the Maricopa County Election Audit
By Gary Meyers
I took notes while watching the Arizona Audit results. No guarantees of accuracy, but this is what I heard and saw:
There were many “anomalies” that Maricopa REFUSES TO EXPLAIN.
1) Surge in duplicate votes arriving AFTER the election, with thousands of unverified or unreadable or blank signatures.
2) thousands of “verified” stamps appeared UNDER an envelope flap on those late votes, which can only happen after someone opens the envelope, a method of cheating or changing the vote.
3) Hundreds of “Two Voter-IDs” associated with the same person at same address.
4) Over 9000 voters were sent ONE ballot, but signed and sent in TWO ballots. Both were counted.
5) Over 1500 votes, from 277 precincts, were counted IN EXCESS of the number of people who showed up to vote.
6) Over 250,000 early votes were counted but did not have corresponding return addresses to where the ballot was sent.
7) Voting machines were tied to the internet, with obsolete anti-virus protection. No corrections or software updates were done, despite warnings. Maricopa failed to retain security logs. Numerous other updates, downloads, etc. were done, but NO VIRUS updates were done, in VIOLATION of election security laws. No validation of an election should happen without following these laws.
😎 All passwords for all users WAS THE SAME PASSWORD, as was initiated during Aug 2019 installation of software on the machines, making it intentionally difficult to track individual users.
9) Unapproved hardware configuration, allowing additional hard drive sharing of data, including data having outside purposes.
10) Over 85,000 scanned ballot files were DELETED from 10.28.20 to 11.05.20, with no method to trace where those files went.
11) Over ONE MILLION election data files were intentionally DELETED through March 2021, against the legal retention requirements.
12) Failure to Preserve data. New logins were done on election machines after the election, which overwrote the previous data.
13) Individuals were CAUGHT making unauthorized changes to the voting machines. Potential criminal referrals to be made. Data was PURGED in the days prior to handing over the machines for the Audit.
14) Multiple internet access points, previously undisclosed, that Maricopa initially denied, but were clearly found in the “internet artifacts” archives. Access and changes were made via the internet, through Feb 2021, and up to the day before the audit started.
15) Internet access device tracking proves that NOT ALL EVIDENCE was provided as required, for the audit.
“There were literally thousands of internet connections to the (Maricopa) system, despite their claims that there were no connections.”
“Based on ANY MEASURE...these election systems are NOT secure. This audit would consider this system a Failure. There was lacking accountability. Easy outside access. Out of compliance date. Average hacker would take 10 minutes to hack this system. It would only take one person to access this system. There is no security.”
Thanx for the bullit points
Best summary I’ve seen Hildy, thank you.
Hildy I think that #2 can only happen with photo manipulation like photoshop, a the presenter indicated, not that it reflects something after the envelopes were opened. The envelope flap they showed was a graphic printed on the envelope. The stamp should have crossed over the graphic of the flap but instead the flap graphic overlaid the stamp. Those may have been printed that way, already approved & someone screwed up the layout.
This article shows what is meant by the ballot flap issue