Can you grasp the fact that looking at the paper ballots is not necessarily what the ballots ended up being counted as on the machines?
Please, just stop the conspiracy theories.
I would like to hear an explanation of the nature of the ballots they got to examine. Were any of them originals? If so, what percentage? Or were they all copies of the originals?
Then, could they discern from a pixel-by-pixel analysis the nature of the ovals filled in? I know it sounds far-fetched, but I want to know if they were able to separate out ballots that may have been filled in by a computer, vs. ballots that were clearly filled in by pen or sharpie. I know Dr. Shiva indicated something along those lines at the beginning, that such analysis might be possible.