Posted on 09/24/2021 12:46:13 PM PDT by janetjanet998
— The Arizona Senate will release its long-awaited audit report of the 2020 election in AZ. Senate President Karen Fann and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Warren Petersen will receive the report on the Senate floor at 1 p.m. followed by a detailed discussion of its findings
Just to follow up on our discussion about duplicate mail-in ballots. To add to the complication, Dr. Shiva mentioned near the end of his presentation that very few envelopes were stamped “approved”, including even envelopes that had valid signatures. I think the figure he gave was some ridiculous amount like 500 envelopes that had the “approved” stamp on them, though I’ll have to double check. So it seems like the ‘approve” stamp was used in a happenstance manner, mostly not being used at all, and that the existence of the “approved” stamp had little effect on whether the ballot contained therein, was added to the mix. But the I think the auditors and Senate need to do more work to try and quantify the number of duplicate ballots that were actually added to the “valid ballots’ stack.
Interesting. Thanks for the link. I too am puzzled over why this info. was not included in the audit report. And I’ve still seen no mention of the analysis that would tell whether a bubble was hand written or machine printed.
There is ample circumstantial evidence that thousands of illegal ballots were systematically injected into the system, and yet, so far, there has been no presentation of evidence that exposes the behind the scenes coordination needed to pull it off. Somewhere there exists incriminating communications between the co-conspirators which tie in to the circumstantial evidence. If we had an FBI that actually did its job, maybe we would have seen it by now.
I also got the impression that the stamps were only occasionally applied, and only to some portion of those which went through adjudication - which was a small minority. Because of lack of cooperation by the County - an act which typically would result in an automatic failure of the audit - there are a lot of basic open questions.
I’m pretty sure that at least some of the discrepancies found will have, if not innocent explanations, explanations which are not directly related election malfeasance. For example, a technician might have installed an extra hard drive into the server in order to allow altering of election data, or to use as a secret personal PC while in the office. Both are illegal, and both compromise the election equipment, but they are different acts.
There is an ability to infer that the County may have excluded ballots which they did not list (and party of the reasons their published numbers don’t match up), such as duplicates, but the numbers which should have been excluded appear to be much larger.
Moving on to the more general:
What is clear is that the ‘audit’ by the County (as well as Fulton County in GA) did not detect a lot of different things which it should have if they did a review worthy of any sort of confidence. Thus the claim that the election was repeatedly verified is simple bunk.
The Rat AZ Sec of State certainly should be forced to resign.
“What is clear is that the ‘audit’ by the County (as well as Fulton County in GA) did not detect a lot of different things which it should have if they did a review worthy of any sort of confidence. Thus the claim that the election was repeatedly verified is simple bunk.”
True, and I guess that’s the bottom line. There’s more than enough evidence to show that the election was uncertifiable. Now the AZ has to have the courage to do what’s right - and that’s going to be an uphill battle.
It will be a complete disaster if we do not take the house and senate.
Jovan is under a Non-Disclosure Agreement about what he can say.
The America Project is releasing more information.
This will blow your mind. It is 1 hour, 25 minutes long. Go to the 53 minute mark for the big reveal. Then rewind to the beginning and watch the whole thing.
https://rumble.com/vmydr7-forensic-audit-aftermath-top-12-lies-and-truths.html
Tell me, if you tunnel your way into the bank and empty the vault in the middle of the night, you are caught with the stolen money, and your fingerprints are all over the vault—— does the FBI need to establish where you bought the shovel you dug that tunnel with? Why do you play their games?
If we continue to follow the lead of McCarthy and McConnell, IT DOESN’T MATTER. We didn’t get where we are because Democrats are so damn smart, for Chris’sake.
What percentage deny having sent in two or three ballots?
Has Dr. Shiva ever indicated what number and/or percentage of the ballots were determined to be filled in by a computer?
Why? Because the FBI are the criminals. But you knew that. BTW, how many people were arrested today for the crimes we heard about yesterday? None? My point remains, America is dead and she ain’t coming back.
I believed I wouldn’t see the truth and a washed document is regrettably what was given …..
What the hell are you talking about?
That video explains a lot. Thanks for sharing.
Another thing that Pulitzer has brought up is that the poor imaging is likely related to them not using the proper paper, as the machines are designed to use specific paper with specific reflectivity properties. Use a different paper, and it may or may not work.
Bttt
“There is no mechanism to decertify the electoral votes in AZ or any other state.”
“I’m sure the state could do so. It just has no legal effect. The Electors were sent. They voted. The Congress accepted the Electoral College vote. That part is done.”
Has a state or county desertification happened before? Is that just a term we’re using that might be a real thing but just doesn’t have any precedent? Not that we shouldn’t pursue it. Just showing proof that biden didn’t win state by state is a good way to start.
Interesting. Having unreadable ballot images would allow them to switch out the paper ballots before they were handed over to the auditors, and not get caught. If that’s what happened, then electronic skullduggery was used initially to miscount the paper ballot totals, then the paper ballots were tampered with later to get the results to match. I don’t know if there’s proof of this, but it would explain a lot, if true.
Also, I saw where the Dominion machines were all programmed to skip the paper validation process to determine if the ballot was printed on legal paper - otherwise all the ballots would have been rejected. It’s a good way to hide the fraudulent ballots. Even legitimate votes would have been cast on bad paper so the paper couldn’t be used to identify the good from the bad.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.