What is incorrect there?
The count may be off, giving more votes to Biden, but they neglect to mention the thousands of fraudulent votes, taking that lead away.
It’s what’s left out.
The count may be a bit different - that will always happen, which is why statistical means are only valid with multiple samples - but what is not said is that the report shows thousands of ballots that should not have been counted.
Whether that leads to a Trump win has not been stated. Tune in at 1 PM MDT today for that.
What is incorrect is this was NOT a recount it was a forensic audit which looked at every single ballot and determined if it was in fact a LEGAL vote. If a candidate gets 2 million votes and wins by 45,000 votes and a forensic audit shows 80,000 ILLEGAL votes then he didn’t win at all.
The lib media are all gaslighting by claiming the vote totals didn’t change when in fact the audit was never about how many votes were given to Biden and Trump but instead was all about how many votes included in the totals were illegal due to duplication of ballots, double scanning of ballots(seen on video), broken chain of custody ballots (ineligible)ballots from people who moved out of State and voted anyway, etc.
Again this was NOT a recount and the submitted vote count from last NOV was not expected to change.
The results in the report have not yet been released.
What if you were told that so-and-so finished first in a race, would you believe it if you saw this winner standing on a platform accepting a 1st place ribbon and a winner’s trophy?
Suppose you heard a group say they have proof that this winner cheated because the cheater was snuck across the field and photographed crossing the finish line, yet the person coming in 2nd place stayed on the official track. When the proof is being prepared for release, a video leak shows the cheater crossing the finish line first.
Are you going you going to ask where is thecheating?
Or are going to demand to see the other side’s proof?