Posted on 09/24/2021 9:21:37 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Pass.
Partisan Media Shill alert.
There were many people in congress, especially in leadership positions, and former white house officials, and in the liberal media, who all colluded to give life to the biggest lie in the country’s history.
Will they all be held accountable? After all, all of them knew that the Trump/Russia collusion story was all based on lie, yet, they all wanted to hang Trump with that huge hoax.
The people demand much more than just Sussman or Hillary or any of their associates. This was corruption at the highest levels of government, and perhaps hundreds of people were in on the lie and collusion.
HMMMMMMMM.....what to think.
Cliff notes and important take-away from it all?
The Clinton campaign concocted a false story to deflect from her legal troubles and injected it into our government and media at every level who ran wild with it violating ethics, many laws, and the constitution at every turn.
Doesn’t look that way to me. Maybe read the article?
5 False Narratives About The Spygate Indictment Of Michael Sussmann
1) someone’s going to jail
2) someone’s going to jail
3) someone’s going to jail
4) someone’s going to jail
5) someone’s going to jail
There’s a temptation to cynically shrug one’s shoulders and observe that “of course the DC swamp will protect its own”, and move on.
That’s a mistake. The Anglo-American idea of the rule of law took centuries to build, and if it’s fully destroyed, as the left intends, it may never be re-built. Too many on the right have given up, which I understand. It can look hopeless, but occasionally, there are rays of hope.
This indictment is one of them.
Sen. Mark Warner (VA) on the Intelligence Committee was a major player.
The thoughtful people from day one spoke of the real meat in this indictment. It is serious. But will the swamp-dwellers do due diligence?
the case “hinges on the testimony of a single witness: the former FBI general counsel, Jim Baker.” “This concession,” as Wittes’ frames it, “appears on page 18 of the indictment, which describes the Sept. 19, 2016, meeting between Sussmann and Baker at FBI Headquarters where the supposed lie happened,” and “notably includes the fact that ‘[n]o one else attended the meeting.’”
Without Baker's testimony, there is no conviction.
“Real Meat”
I agree. This makes references to information technology conspirators. I think one of them is Crowdstrike, but it’s a guess. Crowdstrike involvement with the DNC server, the FBI, and sudden windfalls of money with odd deaths of DNC IT employees in May and June 2016.
This tells me this isn’t going away anytime soon, and it may be way bigger than just spying.
James Baker, former FBI General Counsel, is the only witness against Sussmann.
There are no documents, no audio, and no contemporaneous notes.
James Baker is now employed by Twitter.
Baker has stated publicly that - after five years - he no longer has a clear memory of his conversation with Sussmann.
It was part of a very deep game. Sussman fed to the FBI, which they all knew would get leaked to the media by blabbermouth “sources” in the federal government. By saying “FBI and Intelligence sources say” they gave the media the appearance of credibility. It was entirely part of the scheme. And the media continues to run with these leaky BS artists time and again for years ad infinitum. They are either willing accomplices or the worst journalists in the history of reportage.
I wholeheartedly want to believe you are right.
P
Sorry, forgot the 's' -- it's a reference to the shills who spread the DNC talking points regarding the indictment, not this source.
Got it—good.
I’m scanning over this and seeing it is a strong rebuttal to WAPO’s Marxist twist.
Am I missing something?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.