TexasGurl24 wrote:
“I’d make a coercion argument from the NFIB case. They will try to say “hey limited supply” but this is so transparently coercive I think any sane judge would see through what is actually happening.”
What was the “NFIB case”?
It was the Obamacare case. Everyone focused on Roberts’ “it’s a tax” ruling that they ignored the other stuff in there regarding commerce and coercion.
The anti-coercion holding was 8-1.