Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sons of Union Vets

Many thanks for this info!

Sons of Union Vets wrote:

The following includes Video - Dr. Byram Bridle’s interview with Laura Ingraham Fox News

https://citizenfreepress.com/column-3/dr-byram-bridle-we-made-a-mistake/

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/could-spike-protein-in-moderna-pfizer-vaccines-cause-blood-clots-brain-inflammation-and-heart-attacks/

It is likely that the aforementioned microvascular injury to the brain, heart, liver and kidneys by mRNA vaccines in ways not assessed in safety trials were not properly assessed, is because no sooner did the FDA issue its emergency use authorization, than Pfizer and Moderna INTENTIONALLY broke protocol and ditched its clinical trial test group which is a necessary component in the process of receiving FDA approval.

In response to those accusing the conservative media outlets of peddling conspiracies, it is to be noted that among the first media outlets to report this breach of protocol on the part of Pfizer and Moderna was the liberal NPR in mid - February.

Mott was one of about 650 volunteers who took the experimental Moderna vaccine at a company called Johnson County Clinical Trials in Lenexa, Kan. Dr. Carlos Fierro, who runs the study there, says every participant was called back after the Food and Drug Administration authorized the vaccine.

“During that visit we discussed the options, which included staying in the study without the vaccine,” he says, “and amazingly there were people — a couple of people — who chose that.”

He suspects those individuals got spooked by rumors about the vaccine. But everybody else who had the placebo shot went ahead and got the actual vaccine. So now Fierro has essentially no comparison group left for the ongoing study.

“It’s a loss from a scientific standpoint, but given the circumstances I think it’s the right thing to do,” he says.

People signing up for these studies were not promised special treatment, but once the FDA authorized the vaccines ( vis a vis “emergency use authorization), their developers decided to offer the shots.

Dr. Steven Goodman, a clinical trials specialist at Stanford University, says losing those control groups makes it more difficult to answer some important questions about COVID-19 vaccines.

“We don’t know how long protections lasts,” he says. “We don’t know efficacy against variants — for which we definitely need a good control arm — and we also don’t know if there are any differences in any of these parameters by age or race or infirmity.”....read more....

https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/02/19/969143015/long-term-studies-of-covid-19-vaccines-hurt-by-placebo-recipients-getting-immuni

More recently, the FDA broke its own protocols by blowing off a mandatory public meeting and trashing other requirements in its big rush to approve the “vaccines” with a view to persuading the public that everything was A-OK and further justifying mandates.

Senator Ron Johnson has challenged this big rush on the part of the FDA to approve the “vaccines” referring to several communications he has received from doctors and nurses about serious side effects caused by the “vaccine.” In his letter, he mentions researchers’ concerns about Pfizer’s aforementioned ( NPR report) ditching their clinical trial vi a vis the unblinding of their placebo group.

https://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov/2021/8/sen-johnson-to-federal-health-agencies-expediting-approval-process-appears-to-serve-the-political-purpose-of-imposing-and-enforcing-vaccine-mandates https://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov/services/files/10CC4263-0337-453F-B9E5-1E5BA0FDFD10


170 posted on 09/09/2021 10:28:58 AM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]


To: WildHighlander57
You are entirely welcome for the info!

I have been watching the unfolding of this story like a hawk.

Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson and pharmaceutical companies have a long history of illegal marketing practices. https://themadtruther.com/2021/01/07/pfizer-caught-engaging-in-illegal-marketing-practices-assessed-billions-in-criminal-convictions/

The charges against J&J have not been proven in court, nor are they likely to be. Corporations prefer not to go to trial; rather, they negotiate a settlement that will permit them to continue denying wrong-doing while paying to make the charges go away. (Such settlements may, however, include a formal guilty plea on one or more criminal charges.) Omnicare, as it happens, settled related charges last November for a payment of $98 million to the United States and state governments (Associated Press 2010); with that case settled, J&J will probably choose the same option. The only real issue in dispute will be the size of the penalties.

The amount of money involved in this case is in fact very small potatoes. J&J will probably pay a couple of hundred million in fines and civil penalties. The stakes were somewhat higher last September, when Pfizer and related companies settled a number of charges for a total of $2.3 billion (O'Reilly and Capaccio 2009). This settlement set a new record for a criminal fine – $1.2 billion – plus civil penalties of $1 billion. Subsidiary Pharmacia & Upjohn pleaded guilty to one count of a felony, misbranding of a pharmaceutical, and was assessed a forfeiture of $100 million.

A number of fraudulent marketing practices were involved for a number of different Pfizer or subsidiary products. The criminal charges focused on the illegal promotion of several Pfizer brands – Bextra (valdecoxib, a pain medication, since removed from the market), Geodon (ziprasidone HCl, an atypical antipsychotic), Zyvox (linezolid, an antibiotic) and Lyrica (pregabalin, a seizure medication). These were promoted for “off-label” use, i.e., for uses other than those approved by the FDA.3 But there were also kickbacks to physicians and the use of unverified and misleading marketing materials to promote the prescribing of several other Pfizer brands, including Viagra (sildenafil) and Lipitor (atorvastatin).

This was by no means Pfizer's first offence. In 2007, Pfizer subsidiary Pharmacia & Upjohn paid $34 million and pleaded guilty to paying kickbacks for formulary placement of its drugs and entered into a Deferred Prosecution Agreement for off-label distribution of Genotropin, its brand for the human growth hormone somatropin (US Department of Health & Human Services and US Department of Justice n.d.). ...read entire article... https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2875889/

Given the previously quoted article, should we be surprised to learn that Pfizer and Moderna broke protocol and ditched the clinical trials that were required for FDA approval for the sake of profit?

The more disgraceful element in this horror story is the fact that a corrupt clique of unelected FDA bureaucrats also broke protocol. This begs the question with regard to possible kickbacks.

214 posted on 09/10/2021 4:13:05 PM PDT by Sons of Union Vets (Mine Eyes Have Seen the Glory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]

To: WildHighlander57
Sorry. Here is a clickable link. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2875889/
215 posted on 09/10/2021 4:14:55 PM PDT by Sons of Union Vets (Mine Eyes Have Seen the Glory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson