Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wayne07

Understood about the misquote and did not know this, but how effective or reliable is PCR if the amplification is ramped up to “find” the pathogen? What I mean is if the amplification cycle is 40+ vs 25 what is the percentage of false positives for those two rates?


56 posted on 09/07/2021 9:55:33 AM PDT by frogjerk (I will not do business with fascists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: frogjerk

If one takes a sample and multiply it 40 times you are bound to find something.


59 posted on 09/07/2021 10:13:35 AM PDT by JayAr36 (My disgust with government is complete.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: frogjerk

You are right that there IS a problem with PCR testing: it is that you might show positive weeks or months after having COVID. So if it is being used to quarantine someone, or as a determination as to whether you can get on a plane, it may effectively show a false “contagious” positive. It could show you as sick when that is clearly no longer true because it is amplifying old genetic material. But the one thing it is effective at is showing whether you’ve had COVID at some point, so it is a reasonable way to count total cases. There will be a low false positive for total cases, and high false positive for currently sick.


65 posted on 09/07/2021 12:41:19 PM PDT by Wayne07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson