Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gas_dr; NoLibZone

gas_dr wrote:

“The issue here is that the doctor has no privileges at that hospital. If the judge ruled in favor of plaintiff this would essentially mean any doctor had privileges at any hospital. Additionally writing an rx without even seeing the patient even by telehealth is probably a bad idea.”

Questions:

re: privileges; in the other stories about people getting the hospital to give ivermectin to their loved ones, did the doctor who wrote the prescription have privileges at that hospital?

re: telehealth; people fill out a questionnaire and communicate with a doctor in real-time, so how is that a problem?


57 posted on 09/06/2021 12:59:29 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: WildHighlander57

This particular article states that the physician never saw the patient. My guess is that in other situations the rx was filled by a pharmacy then brought in by the family. A hospital can deny this. It sounds as if the family is expecting the rx to act as an order in the hospital.


59 posted on 09/06/2021 1:02:16 PM PDT by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson