Replies

"With the general assembly not in session, the governor would have been the logical source for relief. I suspect the students did not have the best representation."

Anything the Governor would have done would have met the same fate as Klaassen v. Trs. of Ind. Univ.If you read their Constitution, the Indiana Goobernorship is designed to be subjugated to the General Assembly, and this in turn gives Courts the prerogative to insist a priori restraint on IU must eminate from the General Assembly.

Let me put it to you another way, the Indiana Governor could have implemented the same thing IU did universally on all the students in Indiana and probably not been rejected by the Courts. This is both a problem of the Courts but also a larger problem of protecting and projecting negative liberties.

IU gets one semester of their bullshit and then the IU Smackdown Bill gets first reading the second week of January 2022 and is signed into law the third week of January 2022.