[Lurker]

I’ll repeat myself. He’s an idiot for taking to the NYT.

I don’t do business with idiots.

L

[TangoLimaSierra]

I’ll repeat myself.

Yeah, I think we got it the first time. You really think what you say is so important?
Never mind, it's obvious you do.

[Harpotoo]

Yep he has no one to blame except his foolish self!

[Maskot]

Right? I’ll believe it when the lawsuit is filed. So far….nada. If the NYT twisted his words, isn’t that a pretty good case for defamation?

[lodi90]

Black rifle retweeted the NYT article. They were obviously quite happy with it and how they were portrayed until they started to receive blow black. Then they want into CYA spin mode. I’d take anything they say now with a grain of salt.

[Who is John Galt?]

I’ll repeat myself. He’s an idiot for talking to the NYT.
I don’t do business with idiots.

It's not like this is the first company to sell clothing, with their business name/logo on it. How many mug shots do you think are out there, showing "repugnant" people wearing Coke or Nike shirts, or NFL jerseys? Tens of thousands?

And how would the CEO of Coke or Nike, or an NFL team owner respond, if some reporter asked them about a mugshot showing their logo? They would literally laugh in the reporter's face, and probably ridicule them for suggesting that the company had any control over who wore their merchandise. It's simply the truth, and the most obvious response to an amazingly stupid question.

The coffee guy didn't do that. Bottom line, either he's an idiot, or he's trying out the "woke" business model...

[an amused spectator]

From the looks of this thread, some of these n00b chumps have got stock in Black Rifle Commies.

[Big Red Badger]

That needed Repeating
And
Remember the big
“Misquote” from a year ago?