So you’d accept as POTUS-eligible a dual citizen at birth who nevertheless meets the Minor v. Happersett NBC definition.
I don’t know what definition this court case determined but it’s really irrelevant. Logic tells us the existence of the NBC qualification alone mandates that NBC be defined as a person born on the soil to two citizen parents. If that qualification is met there is no way a person could be born a duel citizen by birth.
This is a good example of why reading court cases is not the best way to look for answers to questions of logic as they often don’t run together. This is my criticism of the great Mark Levin. In my opinion he did way too much reading and not enough thinking on this issue.