That you fervently wish it to be so, it is not.
There are several cases of election fraud where courts have invalidated elections...but always before the officer was seated. There are also cases where either house of congress have refused to seat an elected officer for various reasons.
Even cases where the congress has expelled a member.
But there has never even been a case brought before a federal court asking to remove a seated officer.
Because everyone in the world knows it’s stupid, except you.
Mariner: Um you're wrong...um because it's stupid..um because the world says so.
LOL!
That's Mariner's smart argument.
You loose.
There is never a legal benefit to fraud. Every single legal case follows that very basic legal principle. A fraudulently elected president when proven in a court of law should not retain the exclusive benefit of needing to be removed by impeachment or the 25th amendment.
It doesn't apply to a fraud.