Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rxsid

“If you have one column subjected to spalling, the no. 1 suspect here, it could fail. That one beam could bring down the whole building like a domino effect.”

I don’t know much about construction engineering, but I think that more redundancy than that should be required. A large building that can be brought down by just one failing beam should never have been built.


66 posted on 06/28/2021 8:42:08 PM PDT by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: devere
I don’t know much about construction engineering, but I think that more redundancy than that should be required. A large building that can be brought down by just one failing beam should never have been built.

I'm with you!

67 posted on 06/28/2021 9:37:49 PM PDT by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: devere

“In these buildings that are asymmetrical like this one, there is a possibility that if you have one part of the building that collapses, the building does some turning and twisting,” Ehsani said. “In this case, it is possible that a failure any place in this building could cause distortion to the frame of the building and could cause a collapse in any of the areas, not just adjacent [to the failure].”


69 posted on 06/29/2021 6:55:56 AM PDT by chuck allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: devere
"“If you have one column subjected to spalling, the no. 1 suspect here, it could fail. That one beam could bring down the whole building like a domino effect.”

I don’t know much about construction engineering, but I think that more redundancy than that should be required. A large building that can be brought down by just one failing beam should never have been built.

=========================================================================

That misses the entire point.

There wasn't just a single beam that had corrosion/structural problems. There was cracked/exposed/corroded concrete and rebar in numerous places throughout the building.

In fact, the report done by the engineer in 2018, he mentions he saw about 1/2 of the units as a sample. He clearly didn't see 100% of the building. And, neither did the pool contractor who was there to replace the pool equipment 2 days prior to the collapse. He saw yet other areas of the building and took some photos seen above.

It's highly likely, if an engineer had done a 100% inspection in the days/weeks leading to the disaster, they would have had pages of photos and red flagged support structures located throughout the building.

In particular, in the lower levels in and around the pool deck area which is exactly where the video shows this collapse started.

Even a bit of common sense says it most likely was a single beam that finally gave way, but half a dozen or more that were in bad shape as well, gave way a split second later since they couldn't hold the additional load. So, just like that engineer said...a domino effect.

71 posted on 06/29/2021 7:50:27 AM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson