Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hojczyk; Jane Long; ransomnote; SecAmndmt; Secret Agent Man; Jan_Sobieski; bagster; ...

So much for peer review.


23 posted on 06/20/2021 10:40:01 AM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: metmom; DugwayDuke; ransomnote; Jane Long; grey_whiskers
So much for peer review.

I wonder when things will start to add up for these vaxtards 'round here.

28 posted on 06/20/2021 11:08:40 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: metmom
So much for peer review.

Well, actually...think about it:

Of all the stupid-simple things, they couldn't even be honest about the testing, choosing instead to err on the side of false positives via excessive cycle thresholds...

...until it no longer suited their needs, using the 'cases' to push an agenda, just like "died with COVID" vs. "died of COVID," presumptive postives, modified data collection for adverse events, false promotion of wholly-experimental drugs lacking FDA approval, etc...

...with the wide acceptance of lockdowns and masking the fear mongering propaganda was demonstrably successful.

They met the same standards of 'science' as in the promotion of 'climate change', standards of obfuscation, misdirection & fabrication set by IPCC and Michael Mann...

...and since lefties wrote the definition of peer review for Wikipedia:

Peer review is the evaluation of work by one or more people with similar competencies as the producers of the work. It functions as a form of self-regulation by qualified members of a profession within the relevant field.

...and those supporting the echo chamber are equally qualified (and incompetent) with like motivations in the relevant field...

...doesn't what they did meet the very definition of 'peer review'???

But if the punishment for what the FBI/DOJ/FISA did to law enforcement (i.e. no confidence/discredited) reflects what these scientists & bureaucrats (Fauxi et al) have done to their profession...

Yeah/that.

48 posted on 06/20/2021 10:26:18 PM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: metmom

Irony:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3969609/posts

“Science is the new medieval church, those who are popes of it censor at their will”


50 posted on 06/21/2021 6:07:49 AM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: metmom

More irony:

“The scientific and medical communities now have as much credibility as Brian Stelter or Nicolle Wallace. And deservedly so. Once highly trusted, scientific and medical experts have taken a big step backwards, with trustworthiness now approaching cable news or Congress levels. And they are unlikely to recover from their self-inflicted wounds.”

(or the FBI/DOJ)

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3969590/posts


51 posted on 06/21/2021 6:23:35 AM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson