Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thecodont
Interesting the lack of link to the study, eh?

See below for the White Paper:

A Detailed Study of Patients with Long-Haul COVID : An Analysis of Private Healthcare Claims

I call BS. Note the title itself: They are using a study of 'health claims' without study of the patients' actual health to draw conclusions. The devil's in the details:

To perform this analysis, FAIR Health drew on longitudinal data from its database of over 34 billion private healthcare claim records from 2002 to the present. The nation’s largest such repository, it is growing by over 2 billion claim records per year. All patients in the longitudinal dataset who had been diagnosed with COVID-19 from February to December 2020 were included, except for those with certain preexisting conditions (such as cancer and chronic kidney disease) that might have acted as confounders. The remaining 1,959,982 patients [i.e. patient records] were studied for their case characteristics, such as age, gender and reaction to COVID-19 (i.e., asymptomatic, symptomatic, hospitalization, loss of taste or smell only). They [their records] were further studied for the prevalence of post-COVID conditions 30 days or more after their initial diagnosis with COVID-19. Their post-COVID conditions [RECORDS!!!] were analyzed, with the most common conditions identified. Particular attention was given to age and gender, mental health conditions and death.
How scientific of them. /s Of course, this is all 100% dependent upon the accuracy of digital health records, claims data and diagnoses (let that sink in).

Anyone with an open mind can discern some enlightenment from this 'white paper' - confirmation bias being what it is - but there are fewer details on these patients via this 'study' (nothing more than a data mining project) than on those who've suffered adverse effects from the so-called 'vaccines'.

We all know how the vaxxers treat THOSE "anecdotal" reports...

Oh, and read the line in the SFGate piece about the study NOT being 'peer reviewed' if you're a FReeper reading my comment and getting emotional...

45 posted on 06/16/2021 9:17:04 PM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jane Long

ping

https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3968472/posts?page=45#45


48 posted on 06/16/2021 9:20:07 PM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: logi_cal869

Wow. So much for “private” healthcare claims.

Dataminer’s Delight

😩


50 posted on 06/16/2021 9:21:45 PM PDT by Jane Long (America, Bless God....blessed be the Nation 🙏🏻🇺🇸)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson