Posted on 06/15/2021 7:38:01 AM PDT by maddog55
That’s not the case at all. The virus also causes your cells to produce spike proteins. In fact, it’s a lot more viruses causing a lot more of your cells to produce a lot more spike proteins. If that isn’t causing lupus, neither are the vaccines.
Yes, it starts controlling vaxxer's brains like those little creatures Khan put in the crew's ears in Star Trek 2. They are unable to think critically about the vanccines.
“how a small number of non-replicating spike proteins”
Who told you they were non-replicating? Your body can replicate them.
An infected person carries an estimated 10^9–10^11 virions during peak infection
There’s no mechanism for that. The spike proteins are produced by ribosomes reading the mRNA from the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines. That mRNA breaks down rapidly, with a half-life of just a few hours. There is no other method to produce additional spike proteins. The spike proteins themselves contain no mechanism for replication.
A complete SARS-CoV-2 virion invades a cell, releases its RNA, and churns out copies of itself until the cell dies. Each of those virions is released with the opportunity to continue that process of infection with other cells. This repeats until the immune system completely clears the infection or until the person is dead (actually it continues for some time after death).
“Funny how all these, virologist, epidemiologist and other PhDs are all wrong because they have a different view.”
The author of the article is the problem - obviously a biased, agenda driven propagandist, twisting quotes and making unfounded conclusions.
Even so, he/she/it has damn few real virologists, epidemiologists and other PhDs; from whom to cherry pick some quotes - so far out of the mainstream (and reality) are the pre-determined conclusions that are sought.
What do you care?
I assume you and yours have taken it so what does it matter whether anyone does, or doesn’t? Out of the goodness of your heart that you care about people?
I do have an interest in not seeing additional economic shutdowns by panicked governors, as do we all. The more people who are vaccinated, the less likely that is to happen.
But on an individual basis, whether you choose to get vaccinated or not is absolutely up to you. If you tell me you want to wait, or you don’t like something about the vaccines available today, or you never want a COVID-19 vaccine, that’s fine. That’s your choice. I 100% support your right to make that choice.
But having that choice requires having accurate information. Without accurate information, making an informed decision becomes impossible. When misinformation is spread, it harms peoples’ ability to make an informed choice. I don’t care what choice people make, but I DO care that their RIGHT to make an INFORMED decision remains intact. When people are given misinformation, that is denying them their right to make an informed choice, and I’m always against infringing on peoples’ rights.
Accurate information spouting party line. Hmmm.
BS. Everybody knows that intramuscular injections get into general circulation - the difference is just a matter of degree/speed from an intravenous injection.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Well, I guess it’s a matter of what “primarily” means. The article says the developers assumed the mRNA would stay “primarily” at the vaccination site. So apparently they thought it would circulate to some degree but would mostly stay put.
The relevant questions seem to be:
Does the mRNA circulate a little more than expected, or is it a lot more?
Does the mRNA’s greater than expected circulation result in substantially more risk of problems?
I am not a virologist nor a doctor.
Regardless of the “theory” of the new “vaccine” (not normal vaccine) something has gone terribly wrong with consequences of spike protein generation outside what was expected.
I have a niece who has been involved in doing drug trials for many years for a company in the US (NC) and later an Irish company. I have not talked with her about this situation, but I am aware she was involved in Pfizer’s version.
Dr. Robert Malone has a different opinion than you, but we all know you have a firm grasp of all the facts surrounding the “vaccine”, so he must be wrong. Despite his having an instrumental role in developing the mRNA vaccine
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_NNTVJzqtY
*
When you say “not normal vaccine”, I’m curious what you mean by that. It’s medicine that triggers an immune response, thereby leading to immunity developed against a particular pathogen. So in what way is it not a vaccine?
If Fauci, et al had not demonized the safe therapeutics (HCQ, Ivermectin), this pandemic would have been stopped in its tracks. If there were effective therapeutics, it would have been impossible to get Emergency Utilization permission from the FDA.
Is it a problem that the lipid container with mRNA instructions concentrate in the ovaries? Please explain why it’s ok.
“ Doesn’t fit your view then everyone else is misguided.”
———————————————————————-
Didn’t say “everyone”, I said “Some”.
“ The article says the developers assumed the mRNA would stay “primarily” at the vaccination site. So apparently they thought it would circulate to some degree but would mostly stay put.”
—————————————————————————
Yes, the article says that………..perhaps we should hear from the developers themselves?
Can’t seem to find a single story, interview, video, or any Tweets from a Pfizer Executive saying anything of the sort.
It defies logic. Any I.M. will get throughout your body.
"no differences have been seen when comparing pregnant women participating in the v-safe pregnancy registry with the background rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes."
You know what they DID find increased risks for pregnant women? COVID-19 infection.
Has mRNA ever been used in a human vaccine before?
I’m not in the field, but have these nano tech techniques ever been used in making a vaccine before?
Understanding the nanotechnology in COVID-19 vaccines
https://www.cas.org/resource/blog/understanding-nanotechnology-covid-19-vaccines
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.