Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote

“They intentionally selected a test, the PCR, which does not identify Covid-19”

And a scientist — I think it’s the one who worked for Pfizer — said the PCR tests had an ungodly high percentage rate of false positives.


40 posted on 06/14/2021 5:44:26 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam (Faith, not fear. Faith, not faintheartedness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: MayflowerMadam

COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless

EXCERPT:

We have a simple message for all countries: test, test, test.”
The message was spread through headlines around the world, for instance by Reuters and the BBC.

Still on the 3 of May, the moderator of the heute journal — one of the most important news magazines on German television— was passing the mantra of the corona dogma on to his audience with the admonishing words:

Test, test, test—that is the credo at the moment, and it is the only way to really understand how much the coronavirus is spreading.”
This indicates that the belief in the validity of the PCR tests is so strong that it equals a religion that tolerates virtually no contradiction.

But it is well known that religions are about faith and not about scientific facts. And as Walter Lippmann, the two-time Pulitzer Prize winner and perhaps the most influential journalist of the 20th century said: “Where all think alike, no one thinks very much.”

So to start, it is very remarkable that Kary Mullis himself, the inventor of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technology, did not think alike. His invention got him the Nobel prize in chemistry in 1993.

Unfortunately, Mullis passed away last year at the age of 74, but there is no doubt that the biochemist regarded the PCR as inappropriate to detect a viral infection.

The reason is that the intended use of the PCR was, and still is, to apply it as a manufacturing technique, being able to replicate DNA sequences millions and billions of times, and not as a diagnostic tool to detect viruses.

(...)

Link: https://bpa-pathology.com/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless/


44 posted on 06/14/2021 5:57:14 AM PDT by Fitzy_888 ("ownership society")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: MayflowerMadam

“They intentionally selected a test, the PCR, which does not identify Covid-19”

And a scientist — I think it’s the one who worked for Pfizer — said the PCR tests had an ungodly high percentage rate of false positives.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

It depends on how many cycles they run the PCR. THey knew if they ran PCR tests more than around 25 cycles, the false positive rate would be too high and render the result “meaningless”. Dr. Fauci is usually the one who supposedly said that, but I never looked it up for myself.

So above 25 cycles renders results essentially meaningless, and therefore they decided to run the test at 45 cycles, leaving a 97% false positive rate, and an unknown number of false negatives.

They bet human lives, the US economy and lockdowns on a test that is not specific to Covid-19 (has given positive Covid test results to fruit, goats, and Cocoa Cola). They knew this.

And after the fake ‘vaccines’ were rolled out, they changed the number of cycles for which to run PCR tests but ONLY for the vaccinated. They are conducting medical fraud in treason in broad daylight.

From now on, PCR test results for the vaccinated will be run at 25 cycles, resulting in far fewer false positives, to give the impression the ‘vaccines’ are cutting infection rates more than they are. They KNOW the vaccine ‘effective’ rates are not valid!

Tests for the vaccinated will still be run at 45 cycles and render 97% false positive rates the medical Coup managers will use to falsely blame Covid infections on the unvaccinated.


58 posted on 06/14/2021 8:14:19 AM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson