Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: erkelly

Clearly, you have not been following the details. Consider the evidence: They went through four nannies in a matter of weeks, and five or more staff members resigned from their palace staff due to their behavior, which broke so many employment regulations or common courtesies that a formal HR complaint has been filed against them.

There are hundreds, literally hundreds of examples of petulant Meg and Harry breaking royal protocol and acting against the interests of the royal family or stealthily behind the scenes that have disappointed an angered the British taxpayers.

They hired an American PR team to publicize them as if they are celebrities rather than working royals with established duties and national security guidelines. Completely against Crown protocol, they trademarked their royal titles, opened a web site and designed a bunch of trashy consumer goods like coffee mugs, t-shirts and mouse pads to merchandise their titles, within moments of having extorted a 32 MILLION pound wedding from the British taxpayers ($45 million US dollars). They already had secretly planned to leave UK not only before the wedding, but also before extracting an additional 3 million pounds for a renovation of a house they lived in for a few months before stomping off.

Most Americans do not understans that the British Royal Family and those designated as “working royals” are expected to perform many of the diplomatic and military leadership functions and duties performed by the U.S. Department of State and the Pentagon, as well as social leadership and oversight of the Church of England. The British Crown is responsible for a global strategic alliance of 149 nations of the British Commonwealth.

Being a working royal comes with financial rewards and social privileges in exchange for behaving like top employees of a global corporation. The British military serves and is loyal to the Crown in the same way the American military swears allegiance to the flag and the Constitution. These roles and institutions are called “culture”, and it is not up to Meghan Markle from California to take a wrench to it and start bashing because she snagged someone 6 slots from the top in the line of succession to the throne.

The royal family is constitutionally supposed to remain above politics and not take sides, for the sake not only of the stability of their nation(s), but also their position as allies in NATO. Meghan has tried to make her own rules and impose leftwing American political values onto the Crown by running a popularity contest—thinking that she can set aside the line of succession to the throne established within a 1,000-year-old British system of monarchy and push Harry forward so she can be queen. She has used gossip tabloids to smear members of the royal family and generally set herself at war with them, after having trashed her own family and denied any of them except her mother any access to her or her children. Harry never met with her father or the rest of her family except her mother.

They behave as if they are above any duty, family loyalty or courtesy whatsoever. Their actions border on treason.


99 posted on 06/11/2021 7:18:17 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (God’s will is no concern of this Congress. —Jerry Nadler, 2021)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Albion Wilde
thinking that she can set aside the line of succession to the throne established within a 1,000-year-old British system of monarchy and push Harry forward so she can be queen

And although it is a bit de trop, I think she has a chance of success, much better than as a D list actress.

James Stuart was sent away and King Billy was summoned from over the water in 1688 because James was a Catholic. How much worse is it in 2021 Britain to be a "racist"? It is certainly much, MUCH worse than being a Catholic in 1688.

Harry and Meghan have created suspense, using Oprah to do it, over "who is the racist" that asked them about Archie's skin color. Suppose it's (allegedly) Will? Suppose it's Kate?

Can't you see a Parliament, bombarded by the media and BLM, setting aside the line of succession and sending for the new William and Mary?

I certianly can.

103 posted on 06/11/2021 9:27:16 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Extremism in the defense of Liberty is no vice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson