I agree. I don’t doubt that there were some shenanigans with the machines, but based on what I can decipher it sounds like each state or even each county had some control (or the contractors) over their machines and even then there should still be a paper ballot for each vote tallied.
I agree. I don’t doubt that there were some shenanigans with the machines, but based on what I can decipher it sounds like each state or even each county had some control (or the contractors) over their machines and even then there should still be a paper ballot for each vote tallied.
To anyone that listened to the hearing would know that this is not even close to the truth. I repeat.
Several stacks of batches of ballots (200 votes) not linked to when the batch was run on the voting machine (impossible to trace or track they were entered), spoilage ballots not linked to the voter’s ballot (impossible to determine voter’s intent), ballot counts way off, and no chain of custody for thousands of ballots.