Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rktman

The first thing they are gong to have to do to write a law is to narrow the definition of an assault weapon. Webster defines it as any various automatic or semiautomatic firearm. This means that some automatic or semiautomatic firearms are and are not within the definition.

Furthermore, congress can regulate firearms through its commerce and taxing powers—powers enumerated in the US Constitution. The principal powers available to Congress to regulate firearms are the “commerce power,” arising from the Commerce Clause, and the “taxing power,” arising from the Taxing and Spending Clause. But there is no law that says the federal government can remove firearms based upon their determinations. They can make them expensive through taxation, but it is not in the powers of the Constitution to remove or regulate based upon type of firearm especially when the final determination is states’ rights.

wy69


59 posted on 04/25/2021 1:00:33 PM PDT by whitney69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: whitney69

Fully semi-automatic needs to be added for clarification.


62 posted on 04/25/2021 1:36:20 PM PDT by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson