Look at your argument. You posit that even if it were 100% safe .... so assuming the premise of your argument you wouldn’t get something that is assured safe. This points out the politics of your statement and disavows any science based argument. This is an absurd argument and demonstrates a certain mind set that is what is dangerous. Namely there is no open mindedness.
What he said was "I don’t care if they say it’s 100% safe. A bit of a difference, eh what? Why did you misrepresent what he actually said?
you want an unapproved, mRNA treatment go ahead. The fact the companies are shielded from all liability tells me all I need to know.