Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vaccine-Hesitant Americans Aren’t Ignorant Rubes, They’re Understandably Cautious. Instead of shaming them, we should try to understand why.
The Federalist ^ | 04/21/2021 | John Daniel Davidson

Posted on 04/21/2021 8:35:53 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Recent polls show about a quarter of American adults either don’t plan to get a COVID-19 vaccine or want to wait on it. The numbers have held steady for months: 27 percent in a recent Quinnipiac poll, 25 percent in an NPR/Marist poll from late March, and 30 percent in a Pew survey from mid-February. After federal health officials called for a pause in the distribution of Johnson and Johnson’s one-shot vaccine last week over fears of severe blood-clotting, the number of vaccine-hesitant Americans could be slightly higher now.

That means tens of millions of American adults won’t be getting a vaccine, at least not right away. Why? For corporate media, the answer is simple: those people are idiots who have either bought into crazy conspiracy theories about the pandemic or are simply too selfish and lazy to do the right thing. Dr. Anthony Fauci, for one, is very frustrated with them.

For outlets like The New York Times, it’s even simpler: “Least Vaccinated U.S. Counties Have Something in Common: Trump Voters,” ran a recent headline in the Times. The article argues that vaccine hesitancy “is highest in counties that are rural and have lower income levels and college graduation rates — the same characteristics found in counties that were more likely to have supported Mr. Trump.”

In other words, it’s all those science-denying MAGA idiots who are wary of getting a COVID-19 vaccine. The Times article notes the vaccine gap persists even in wealthier Trump-supporting areas, so it’s not just poor and uneducated Trump voters who are vaccine-suspicious, they’re all like that. Figures, right?

Not quite. The Trump administration shepherded these vaccines into existence. It was Trump’s own Operation Warp Speed that oversaw the record-breaking development of COVID-19 vaccines. Indeed, Trump himself boasted last fall that every American would be able to get a vaccine by April of this year, a prediction the media mocked at the time but has now come to pass. Devotion to Trump, then, would suggest an enthusiasm for the vaccines he championed, not hesitancy.

The Long-Term Effects of the Vaccines Are Unknown

Could there be some other explanation, then — one that hasn’t yet occurred to reporters at the Times and other corporate media outlets — why so many Americans in rural, Republican-leaning places are reluctant to get the vaccine? Could it be that residents of these places have had a different experience with this pandemic than coastal elites and New York Times reporters?

Perhaps they assessed the risks of getting COVID compared to the risks of an experimental medical treatment whose long-term effects are unknown, and decided that the former is a risk they’re willing to take. Is that unreasonable? Is it crazy?

Of course not. Consider North Dakota, which currently has the highest number of COVID cases per capita in the country. It’s also one of the states with the highest number of estimated vaccine-wary residents. How could this be? Perhaps it has to do with risk assessment. After all, the one-week average number of COVID cases in North Dakota has hovered below 200 since mid-January, and the one-week average number of COVID deaths statewide has vacillated between one and zero since the beginning of February.

Maybe a fair number of North Dakotans have decided that in their sparsely populated state, COVID is not actually a great risk to them and their families, and that they’d rather take their chances with the virus than on a vaccine that by any historical standard amounts to a mass medical experiment.

Consider also that in a relatively young state like North Dakota (the median age is just over 35) vaccine hesitancy might be especially prevalent among young couples hoping to have children, or women who are pregnant, since there is currently almost no data on the safety of the vaccines in pregnant women, according to the Centers for Disease Control.

If you consume corporate media, you’ll hear just the opposite, that the vaccines pose no risk at all to pregnant women or children in utero, and that there’s no risk of infertility associated with the vaccines. But those assertions aren’t based on science or data, because there is no data on this yet.

Pfizer and Moderna didn’t include any pregnant women in their clinical trials, and Pfizer only launched a large-scale clinical trial for pregnant women in late February, after its COVID vaccine had been approved for general use around the world. The company estimates the trial won’t conclude until January 2023, so it might be years before we have data showing what, if any, effects that vaccine has on pregnant women and their children.

The Vaccines Also Pose Moral Questions

Beyond the unknown long-term health effects of the vaccines, there are ethical and moral questions that religiously observant Americans are likely taking into account. In March, the Catholic Archdiocese of New Orleans issued a statement urging Catholics not to get the Johnson and Johnson vaccine, which it called “morally compromised” because of its “extensive use of abortion-derived cell lines.”

All the major COVID-19 vaccines use cells originally derived from aborted children in the 1970s and 80s, but unlike the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, which only used these cell lines to test their vaccines, the Johnson and Johnson vaccine used them in the development and production of their vaccine, as well as the testing.

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops quickly followed up with its own statement, saying that if Catholics are able to choose between vaccines, the ones that have the least connection to abortion-derived cells lines should be chosen. “Therefore, if one has the ability to choose a vaccine, Pfizer or Moderna’s vaccines should be chosen over Johnson & Johnson’s.”

Some Catholic leaders have gone further. In December, Bishop Joseph Strickland of Tyler, Texas, said all the vaccines that make use of abortion-derived cell lines are morally objectionable. “The bottom line for me is, does it actually contain the markers, the DNA, of aborted children? If it does, I’m not going to accept it,” said Strickland.

And it’s not just Catholics. Some evangelical Christian leaders have also expressed moral objections to getting a vaccine. A Kaiser Family Foundation poll published last month found that 28 percent of white evangelical Christians say they will definitely not get a vaccine, and another 21 percent said they will wait and see or only get a vaccine if required to.

Religious Americans have a point here. An epidemiologist has no special authority on moral questions like these. As C.S. Lewis said, “Let the doctor tell me I shall die unless I do so-and-so; but whether life is worth having on those terms is no more a question for him than for any other man.”

Shaming And Insulting Vaccine-Hesitant Americans Won’t Persuade

That Kaiser poll had another, less publicized finding: 51 percent of non-health care essential workers say they will definitely not get a vaccine, will only get one if it’s required, or will wait and see. In other words, people who work at grocery stores and gas stations, who have been working throughout the pandemic, are less inclined to get vaccinated than people who have the sort of jobs that allow them to work from home.

You can see a pattern taking shape here. The groups least likely to get a vaccine — rural residents, conservative Christians, the working class, Republican voters — are the very groups corporate media and left-wing elites hate the most.

The concerns of vaccine-hesitant Americans, whether about the safety of the vaccines or the morality of taking them, are utterly alien to our elites. It’s easy, then, for The New York Times to chalk up all such qualms to ignorance and stupidity — much like worries about election integrity, or allowing men to compete in women’s sports, or many other contentious issues. In every case, the answer is the same: those people are idiots.

What our elites don’t seem to grasp is that vilifying the tens of millions of Americans who refuse, on various grounds, to get a vaccine, will not change their minds. Lectures on CNN from a disappointed Dr. Fauci will not give them pause. Insulting them on “Saturday Night Live” will not shame them into compliance.

The reason these things won’t work is that many Americans have decided the ruling class doesn’t really know what they’re talking about. After their many failures, not just during the past year of the pandemic but going back decades, many Americans have heard enough. Call them what you will, but they intend to make up their own minds about the vaccines, when they’re good and ready.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: caution; covid19; fauxccine; vaccines
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: Vermont Lt

I agree with you but the one problem is the stores are not given a choice about masks at least here in California. They have been strangely deputized to enforce all mask and social distance notions. So I can’t avoid stores where it’s enforced.


41 posted on 04/21/2021 9:57:36 AM PDT by Persevero (I am afraid propriety has been set at naught. - Jane Austen )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange

I have never supported a mandatory vaccination process and think people should have the choice. However I think that choice should be based on valid data instead of talking points.


42 posted on 04/21/2021 9:57:38 AM PDT by gas_dr (Trial lawyers AND POLITICIANS are Endangering Every Patient in America: INCLUDING THEIR LIBERTIES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

https://twitter.com/FrankLuntz/status/1371518653359812608

A new Luntz focus group panel backs up the article...

“Much of the group’s doubt toward the COVID vaccine comes from the overall politicization of the pandemic.”

The reporting on covid has been politicized and “narratized” to the point of dangerousness.


43 posted on 04/21/2021 9:59:17 AM PDT by mrsmith (US MEDIA: " Every 'White' cop is a criminal! And all the 'non-white' criminals saints!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If this experimental treatment they call a vaccine is safe, why are the manufacturers indemnified from lawsuits?


44 posted on 04/21/2021 10:01:08 AM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

Why do people want to curtail other people’s freedoms? It’s a concept I don’t understand. For the public good, we do come up with laws with mild freedom limits when they intrude upon others. No smoking in restaurants or Driving drunk. Ok.

But if it’s ok for someone to engage in multiple brief anal sex dalliances, if it’s ok to climb rocks without ropes, if it’s ok to eat a horrible diet, then it’s ok to choose whether to take a certain medicine.


45 posted on 04/21/2021 10:01:59 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
I’ve had Covid. Vaccine is only going to teach my immune system what it already knows.

That's correct. Some studies show better immunity from COVID than from vaccines. The Qatar study showed 2 in 10,000 reinfection with less severe illness. We know the breakthrough rate is at least 1 in 10,000 in vaccination individuals.

46 posted on 04/21/2021 10:02:53 AM PDT by palmer (Democracy Dies Six Ways from Sunday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JstABrdPstr

RE: - It is not FDA approved.

What is the Emergency Usage Approval (EUA) from the FDA then?


47 posted on 04/21/2021 10:04:12 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

RE: I’ve had Covid. Vaccine is only going to teach my immune system what it already knows.

The question is this -— How LONG will this knowledge from your immune system last vs. the “knowledge” ( note the quotes ) given by the vaccines?


48 posted on 04/21/2021 10:05:25 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
What is the Emergency Usage Approval (EUA) from the FDA then?

EUA allows the use of unapproved treatments.

49 posted on 04/21/2021 10:06:17 AM PDT by palmer (Democracy Dies Six Ways from Sunday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: palmer

RE: EUA allows the use of unapproved treatments.

If it is an unapproved treatment, then they shouldn’t be using the word “Approval”.


50 posted on 04/21/2021 10:07:18 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The Nation of Islam is the largest antivaxxer group in America.


51 posted on 04/21/2021 10:08:03 AM PDT by AppyPappy (How many fingers am I holding up, Winston? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

52 posted on 04/21/2021 10:09:35 AM PDT by yoe (Follow the money on Covid or for Covid...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
If it is an unapproved treatment, then they shouldn’t be using the word “Approval”.

They didn't.

On the basis of the determination by the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services on Feb. 4, 2020, that there is a public health emergency that has a significant potential to affect national security or the health and security of United States citizens living abroad, and issued declarations that circumstances exist justifying the authorization of emergency use of unapproved products, the FDA may issue an EUA to allow unapproved medical products or unapproved uses of approved medical products to be used in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent COVID-19 when there are no adequate, approved and available alternatives

53 posted on 04/21/2021 10:09:57 AM PDT by palmer (Democracy Dies Six Ways from Sunday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

And the politicization of the issue goes hand in hand with the government’s undermining of traditional trusted sources of information (e.g., science, religion, parental wisdom, traditional wisdom, common sense, physics, biology, news media) so that when people are skeptical of government edicts, it now tries unsuccessfully to resort to those undermined sources and it doesn’t wash with thinking people.


54 posted on 04/21/2021 10:12:50 AM PDT by caseinpoint (Don't get thickly involved in thin things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Here’s a question: In NYS, primary care providers aren’t being allowed to offer vaccinations.

Why?


55 posted on 04/21/2021 10:16:39 AM PDT by mewzilla (Those aren't masks. They're muzzles. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Both are limited. Immunity half-life of each remains unstated.


56 posted on 04/21/2021 10:17:24 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (The claim of consensus is the first refuge of scoundrels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: gas_dr
A distinction without difference.

No it most certainly is not.

57 posted on 04/21/2021 10:26:48 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham ("God is a spirit, and man His means of walking on the earth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Of course at the time thalidomide was being dispensed there was no proof that it could cause any harm.


58 posted on 04/21/2021 10:28:24 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham ("God is a spirit, and man His means of walking on the earth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

EAU = emergency use AUTHORIZATION, not approval.

Look up the FDA meaning of the two designations.


59 posted on 04/21/2021 10:32:29 AM PDT by Jackson Brown (Accomplished without a barrier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

‘’If it is an unapproved treatment, then they shouldn’t be using the word “Approval”.’


They don’t ... it’s Emergency Use AUTHORIZATION.


60 posted on 04/21/2021 10:36:07 AM PDT by Jackson Brown (Accomplished without a barrier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson