Supreme Court tosses out another Republican 2020 election challenge

CNN ^ | 04/19/2021 | Ariane de Vogue and Rachel Janfaza

[LibertarianLiz]

It is troubling that the Supreme Court won’t even hear these cases.

Several months ago Mark Levin stated that the SC had not held one evidentiary hearing on this subject, not one. And, I don't believe, since he stated that, that there has been a hearing of the evidence by the SC.

I remember when the Attorneys General of several States petitioned the Court, they were told that they did not have standing. My reaction was, if duly elected AGs of different States do not have standing, does anyone have standing? Obviously, not We the People.

The Supreme Court appears to be as corrupt and biased as the political branch.

[crusher]

“We know Robert’s the weasel sides with Dems”

We can now safely state that Roberts does not “side” with the anti-Constitutionalists, he*is* an anti-Constitutionalist. We can usually count on Thomas and Alito, and one of The Donald’s picks. We never know in advance which one.

[NEPA]

Alito

He issued an injunction but it was ignored

[Lurking Libertarian]

We know Robert’s the weasel sides with Dems so who of the new appointees joined the cabal to get to 5-4 and on what basis.

The Court declined to hear the case. It only takes 4 votes to hear a case, but the order has no dissents listed.

[Lurking Libertarian]

Was the count 5-4? Again?

Nope, 9-0.

[patriotspride]

The Court declined to hear the case. It only takes 4 votes to hear a case, but the order has no dissents listed.

.........

Thanks for that clarification. Wonder if they vote independently or in person and read the tea leaves as things progress. In other words it’s not worth dissenting