Doses Delivered: 4,000 (Weekend pause) (3,000 J&J, Weekend pause)
Total Administered: 3.6 million (Very Good) (482,000 J&J - Good)
New People Receiving 1st Dose: 2. Million (Good)
People Fully Vaccinated: 1.9 Million (Very Good)
Strong inventories on hand (51 million).
% Total Population with at least a First Shot: 35.9% (up 0.6)
Those ≥ 18 Years of Age (Adults): 45.9% (up 0.8)
Those ≥ 65 Years of Age: 78.5% (up 0.4) (61.4% Fully Vaccinated - up 0.8)
Daily Deaths, Cases, and New Hospitalizations slightly up on this report.
Thanks BeauBo. It looks like in another week or so 50% of American adults (those 18 or over) will have received at least their first dose.
I’m not getting it.
Friend of mine just got it march 19 died of Covid April 7
I encourage everyone, vaccinated or not, to familiarize themselves with treatments available.
A Guide to Home-Based COVID Treatment
aapsonline.org ^ | December 11, 2020 | Jane M. Orient M.D., & Elizabeth Lee Vliet, M.D.
Posted on 3/25/2021, 11:44:49 PM by ransomnote
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Below is VAERs data (4/9/2021) for those over 65. A study at Harvard found that VAERS only captures about 1 -2 % of actual adverse events, and Covid-19 is so highly politicized, I believe VAERS data is even more scarce. Furthermore, 75+ percent of actual adverse reports for those receivign Covid-19 "vaccinations" are presently data entered and available to the public. Therefore the reports in VAERS are likely a small fraction of negative experiences people are having.
1/4 reports actually in VAERS (so multiply reports by 4), 1-2% actually reported to VAERS (so multiply reports by 25 to 50), politicized environment suppressing reportage= ?. This works out to be a likely miminum of 1/200 of the actual events, and that's being cautious (1/4 in VAERS and assuming 2% reported, ignoring suppression of reporting)
That would mean at the 1807 deaths reported (agreed not all are related to vax) X 4 X 50= 361,400 deaths likely observed in the days following vaccination (not causal evidence yet - observation only) thus far.
These deaths need to be investigated but I keep seeing records in VAERS and ancedotes which reveal that they won't be declared 'caused' by vaccine until significant studies (years of research) indicates HOW the vaccine impacted the patient (not just 'heart attack' or 'brain annuerism' but the chemical/biological chain events triggered by mRNA that caused the heart attack etc.)
I've seen so many reports of collapse within a day or two of vax, followed by steep decline to illness and death. Even if the patient's doctor tells the family they believe it was related to vax, the VAERS continues to say no evidence that vax caused death etc.
As promised, here's VAERS observed reports for persons over 65:
Wow, pushing 80% of those over 65!
Herd immunity will be a topic and I hope some pros discuss the role of the non-human part of our “herd”.
Pets, rats, bats, etc. are not being vaccinated and will have to deal with the virus on their own- but they’re members of our “herd”.
I suspect that pool of infection is a reason for “booster” shots later.
Anyway, would like to see a professional explication.
BM
Anyone who gets these Covid shots is an IDIOT!!!!!
Do Vaccines Make Us Healthier?
Three independent studies released in 2020 compared the overall health of vaccinated and unvaccinated people and the results are striking. Everyone who is considering vaccination for themselves or their families should weigh the striking results of these reports before making a fully informed decision.*
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=f1L_UWTkFf4
It seems this was predicted and as new mutations show up we may not have seen the end of it.
CCP Virus Variant Affects Vaccinated People More Than Unvaccinated People: Study
BY JACK PHILLIPS
April 11, 2021 Updated: April 11, 2021
biggersmaller
Print
A study from Tel Aviv University found that a South African variant of the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus affects people vaccinated with the Pfizer shot more than unvaccinated people.
The study, which has not yet been peer-reviewed, indicated that the B.1.351 variant of the virus—also known as the novel coronavirus—was found eight times more than individuals who were unvaccinated, or 5.4 percent against 0.7 percent. Clalit Health Services, a top Israeli health-care provider, also helped in the study.
“We found a disproportionately higher rate of the South African variant among people vaccinated with a second dose, compared to the unvaccinated group,” said Adi Stern of Tel Aviv University. “This means that the South African variant is able, to some extent, to break through the vaccine’s protection.”
The study looked at 400 people who received at least one shot of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine and had contracted the COVID-19 variant and compared them to the same number of people who were infected and unvaccinated. Moderna’s vaccine is also used in Israel, but it was not included in the study.
“It is the first in the world to be based on real-world data, showing that the vaccine is less effective against the South Africa variant, compared to both the original virus and the British variant,” said Professor Ran Balicer, director of research at Clalit, according to news reports.
Stern said the study’s findings came as a surprise.
“Based on patterns in the general population, we would have expected just one case of the South African variant, but we saw eight,” Stern told the Times of Israel. “Obviously, this result didn’t make me happy.” He added, “Even if the South African variant does break through the vaccine’s protection, it has not spread widely through the population.”
He continued: “These preliminary findings necessitates close continued attention to the dissemination of this strain in Israel, emphasizing the need for epidemiological monitoring and systematic sequencing, in order to contain further spread of the South African variant in Israel.”
The South African variant accounted for less than one percent of all COVID-19 cases in Israel, reported AFP, citing the study.
“This means that the Pfizer-BioNtech vaccine, though highly protective, probably does not provide the same level of protection against the South African (B.1.351) variant of the coronavirus,” the study said.
Israel, separately, has rolled out a so-called “vaccine passport” system that allows people who have been vaccinated privileges over individuals who are not vaccinated. Such systems have been criticized by civil liberties groups, saying it would be an infringement on people’s rights, including privacy, and would potentially create a two-tiered class system of vaccinated and unvaccinated people.
The Epoch Times has contacted Pfizer for comment.
As noted prior, COVID-19 threads have a low signal to noise ratio.
There’s enough sourced information out there for each person to make a data informed decision.
But at the end of the day, it is each person’s decision. And FReepers need to accept that.
Some of the worst offending issues are 1) mask wearing and 2) vaccines.
Good grief, people. Don’t get so wrapped around the axle that others don’t see COVID-19 issues the same as you or don’t make the same decisions as you.
Unfortunately, there are FReepers on both sides that seem to not only disagree with the “other sides” but also antagonize and make the issues personal with insults and threats. A flame war erupts, rendering the thread essentially useless.
Provide references for your positions and argue as politely as possible.
That’s all you can do.
Good numbers!
80% plus of the over sixty-five demographic is a lock now.
2/3rds of all adults seem likely now too.
Not too shabby considering Dementia Joe slowed down the rollout in a lame attempt to rewrite Operation Warpseed’s roll-out plans before belatedly reversing course.
VAERS data in CDC WONDER are updated every Friday. Hence, results for the same query can change from week to week.
