Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SmokingJoe

Yes, if Harry became king, she would be Queen Consort. As earlier explained, Harry is still in the line of succession to the crown; but would only become king if his father, brother and brother’s children all died or renounced the throne.


118 posted on 04/12/2021 6:56:25 PM PDT by Albion Wilde ("One steps out with actresses, one doesn't marry them."—Phillip, Duke of Edinburgh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]


To: Albion Wilde
Harry is still in the line of succession to the crown; but would only become king if his father, brother and brother’s children all died or renounced the throne.

Fortunately for the Crown and Great Britain, the moment that becomes a possibility, a long-filed-away blood sample test result will be made public barring Harry Hewitt from ascending the throne.

He knows it. The royal family knows it. It's a factor in why he so easily left England to take up residence with a nasty gold digger yacht girl.

119 posted on 04/12/2021 7:03:34 PM PDT by Magnatron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

To: Albion Wilde
Harry is as likely to become king like Adam Schiff is to become president.
Harry is not the heir to the throne right now. That would be a Prince Charles. After Charles, there is Prince William, then the three children of William.
Not to mention Prince William will probably have even more children.
Looking back through English history, I don't recall any instances where there was a heir to the throne followed by his first son, followed by his first son's three children, where the younger brother of the second in line ended up as king. Not without a body war.
123 posted on 04/13/2021 2:41:06 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson