I disagree. The resemblance here is much more striking:
Check the line of the nose, the sweep of the chin, the curl of the smile, and the slope of the brow -- not to mention the hair.
Posted on 04/11/2021 5:19:02 AM PDT by Magnatron
Meghan Markle will not be attending Prince Philip's funeral alongside her husband, Prince Harry, who plans to attend.
On Saturday, one day after the Duke of Edinburgh's death, Buckingham Palace officials announced a private funeral will be held at Windsor Castle on April 17.
The palace said Philip took part in planning his funeral and the focus on family was in accordance with his wishes. The 99-year-old duke died at the age of 99.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Of course and they will name her Diana
I disagree. The resemblance here is much more striking:
Check the line of the nose, the sweep of the chin, the curl of the smile, and the slope of the brow -- not to mention the hair.
Hewitt has the wide-set eyes typical of Anglo-Saxon-Pictish-Celtic Brits. Harry has the close-set eyes and long nose more typical of the Hanoverian Germans and Scandanavians. Harry's grandfather Philip Mountbatten was German and Danish, and his father Charles is from the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha German royal line.
Hewitt's ears are flatter and his nose is shorter. His forehead is broader and rounder at the top, but Harry has the Scandanavian "horns" at the top of his brow. And, Harry's eyes are blue, as are his father Charles' and were his grandfather Philp's. Hewitt's eyes are clearly brown:
A recent article in the DailyMail showed Hewitt working as a groundskeeper in a retirement community, where he lives with his mother. He has had a stroke and has fallen on hard times. If there is any chance at all that he is Harry's father, but Harry and William wanted to remain brothers, Harry and William themselves would have had a DNA test and would be sending this man financial support to keep him quiet. Hewitt himself may could even blackmail the palace to help him if he were the father—but he has not.
And lastly, if Harry were not blood, once he and Megan betrayed the Royal Family, the palace could have leaked the "news" of his stray DNA to the press, making it easier to pry him out of the line of succession.
In fact, in today's world, adventurous snoops from the shameless British tabloids may have picked up a cigarette butt or a drinking glass from both parties LONG AGO and had them tested. But nothing has emerged. If the tabloids are sitting on anything, it's probably the DNA proof that Charles is the father.
See post 124.
That has nothing to do with who is going to be king after Charles. That would be Prince William.
You don’t understand the system, or the explanations of the system I have posted to you, so stop posting about it. You don’t get it.
A freeper who “read some pretty good volumes” about the pre-digital past, and is therefore the top FR strategist for the Royal Family’s current dilemma, and predicts that nothing unusual will happen to their monarchy, just after our elections and those of several other nations have been subjected to globalist/cyber interference and color revolutions.
Our cities are burning with incited insurrections, and our conservatives and media have been silenced, but you see no danger to the Brits, whose country is already full of islamists and international financiers.
Okay.
Except who becomes the next King of the UK has nothing whatsoever to do with BLM crazies setting cities on fire.
The succession is done according to a fixed set of rules.
Last time I looked, Harry is the sixth person in the order of succession. Prince Harry will NOT be King.
I have acknowledged your absolute assertion over and over. You don’t seem to understand that there are no guarantees in this life, including a lock on who will be King, rules or no rules.
Wise people look at what can go wrong and prepare for it, which is why the Crown should prepare to deal with the worst that can happen due to Harry being a loose cannon who is being “handled” by some malevolent people with very powerful tools at their disposal. Unless, of course, you think the shadow president Obama is no threat.
As for BLM having “nothing to do” with the UK, the same Soros and associates globalist organizations that are inciting and funding the civil disorder in this country are also operating in Europe. Soros has paid groups of protesters all over the world in his fight against national sovereignty, Christianity, and local control of governments. Every time an activist group like BLM or Occupy, etc threatens to cause unrest in a city in the U.S., his organizations rush in to provide training, equipment, and transportation; and afterwards, lawyers and bail money. Soros has already done this all over Europe to tip elections, and has been permanently barred from several nations because of it.
That is how civil unrest in the U.S. is a warning to any other nation undergoing a change in leadership, which will soon happen when the Queen dies in the next years or months. He will fund huge street protests calling for an overthrow of the monarchy if it suits his ideas of the moment; and if not him, one of his three sons who are primed to take over their globalist project.
after the kid is popped she will divorce and use the kid as leverage. she will wait long enough to manufacture a reason it is the princes fault...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.