Replies

My answer to your ridiculous hypothetical is that the Constitution itself contemplated Americans having fully armed WARSHIPS. See Letters of Marque in Article 1, Section 8.

Personally, I would draw the line at WMDs, but the Constitution does not say any such thing.

That’s not an answer. This isn’t a warship. This is a weapon that with the push of the button can wipe out 99% of humanity.

Why do you draw the line at WMD’s if the Constitution is silent about them?

"Personally, I would draw the line at WMDs, but the Constitution does not say any such thing."

Would the framers have put impulsive village clowns in charge of cannon and a magazine? Did random individuals each take a cannon, powder and cannonballs to their homes? In my opinion, we should consider the founders' intents when commenting (text, history and tradition) along with compelling government interests (interests of the people in general).

That's what our forefathers did while deciding what to put in the Constitution. They assumed that we would know, for example, about the right to our lives. They would only have allowed control of a WMD to be distributed between a group of most trusted individuals with thorough background checks.

Individuals presumed to be reasonable and in possession of rifles, not so regulated. Only an extremely small fraction of murders are committed with rifles, even with over 20 million superphlasmatic rifles (modern sporting rifles) in common use today. Modern sporting rifles are, on balance, more beneficial to "the people" (government) than deleterious (self-defense, sport, health, national defense, etc.).

We need control of drugs, criminals and psychotics--not more gun control, and that's one argument that needs to be presented to legislators and judges. We don't need the online insults, false accusations of disloyalty and threats against our own politicians and best justices that we've been seeing. Those kinds of comments are nothing other than coercion in favor of gun control.

If we want something from politicians and justices, we must be the good guys in their minds--not the crazy bad guys.