Posted on 04/04/2021 1:12:17 PM PDT by RomanSoldier19
You realize they can only say 6 months because the first trials only started 6 months ago. They last “at least” six months is what the article should say.
No worries they will change their mind in 3,2,1..the second someone tells them “Quick go back and say the opposite because we cant risk losing POWER” This virus equals permanent power to the commies cant give that up EVER..now second question, if you are FULLY vaccinated, can you still spread the virus to those who are NOT? Every 2 seconds we hear a different answer. My sister has two kids, a 7 month old and a 6 yr old..my sis and her hubby are both fully vaccinated..they have a nanny they used to use for the 6 yr old, the nanny is fully vaccinated herself, she would love for her to come over and help with the baby but she is afraid to because the liars at the CDC keep changing their damn “Opinion”
First this is not really clinical science
Second in order to understand carbon dioxide and what it does you have to have a rudimentary understanding of respiratory physiology.
Clearly this is a graph used in a silo and fails to discern what really occurs
Perhaps is would be good for you to refer to a standard respiratory physiology text (west respiratory phys is good) to understand the clinical significance. This is really a graph full of sound and fury signifying nothing.
If your leading with Simone Gold you should probably check your sources. She is a complete quack and her group is been shown to be fringe. And that is being kind
You realize this is a scam.
You are welcome to think what you want. How about some reasonable established science to back it up. What have I said that ir factually inaccurate.
You realize you’re literally a bot.
Again
Do you understand what mRNA is and where it comes from? Do you know what genes are and where they are located ?
If you can answer these basic questions then you too can understand the incorrectness of your statements.
Look up a basic biology book and study a little. It will broaden your horizons.
mRNA is a gene therapy (unplanned for, then ignored).
... but your company KNOWS that, and asked for immunity
to lawsuits. and got it.
now you push your bioweapons here. why?
again, you are unable to tell the Truth here.
why?
An mRNA vaccine does not touch DNA. (Research the difference between DNA and RNA ....)
_____
Correct but its also not a vaccine, its a synthetic medical device attempting to mimic your bodies natural response to disease and its Not Yet Approved By the FDA, EU approval just means everyone taking it is participating in a clinical trial. Real safety issues for those taking it wont be known for a couple of years.
Masses moved by the Lemming Effect. Sad really.
Dude. If you guys are gonna pass off gene therapy as a “vaccine” without answering simple questions honestly then GFY.
You realize you’re mimic’ing 12 year olds by using “literally” when you mean “figuratively”.
Take a writing class.
Okay, I will cop to my subterfuge because you nailed it.
The reason my family caught Whooping Cough was that it was considered to be eradicated and the pertussis vaccine was no longer part of the regular regimen.
But our family and apparently 2 other families in the SF Bay Area in the 1960s put that disease back on the map.
+1
If you don’t know the difference between mRNA and genes you already had FY. While you get an A+ in copy and paste. Not so much in basic science
5,6,7.8.9,10,14 are incorrect on your chart. At the least they are open to debate but the vaccines are showing that it prevents spread and infection. So please update your data.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.