You are right.
This article is bragging about what they can do, perhaps even what they have done, but does not even suggest that they are close to releasing a report of any kind that shows the "hot spots" of conspirators, shows the "hot spots" of addresses, lists the repeated names, etc.
If they really can build a "family tree" of connections like Ancestry.com, they should have said they are working on it and will release their report shortly. They did not.
We all know that the fraud happened. It will happen again if the collaborators are not prosecuted. Data needs to be collated to demonstrate where the suspicious activity happened and who lives at those places. The author of this article suggests that they can do that, but stops short of saying that they are doing it, or are doing it in any kind of coordination with law enforcement.
-PJ
My view is the author was being deliberately vague for a reason. Probably to avoid being sued.