I watched the interview because I was bored with the other TV options. I admit to being interested in British royalty.
There were quite a few things Meghan said that I thought were a bit questionable, and not verifiable.
One thing she said I agreed with. The news media seems to always define stories about women as one of good vs bad; i.e. one person is saintly and the other is wicked and witchy. I happen to admire Catherine, the Duchess of Cambridge.
Meghan allowed Oprah to continually bring up Kate regarding the story of who caused who to cry at the time of the Harry/Meghan wedding.
After that, she spoke about the color of Archie’s skin. I blame Oprah for that. OW seemed determined to use racism as a subject of the interview. By denying the Queen and the Dk of Edinborough were the origin of the skin color comments, the implication is it was either Charles or William who made the comments. I cannot speak for African-American sensitivities, but it seems foolish to assume an off hand comment proves racism. And, if it bothers you, perhaps a better solution is to ignore comments which are not made maliciously.
Good stuff if you’re into psychology. Harry is from an enmeshed, dysfunctional family dynamic who marries a narcissistic Hollywood actress...... The power struggle, scapegoat and flying monkeys make for great entertainment...
This reminded me of Michelle Obama's early days in the White House...when she established a vegetable garden on the Grounds right away. But the farming duties of a vegetable garden--watering, weeding, fertilizing--were quickly sublet to the White House Groundskeeping Staff, while Michelle and her entourage jetted off to Spain for an extended holiday.
The rain in Spain stays mainly in the plain!
The rain in Spain stays mainly in the plain!
Again
The rain in Spain stays mainly in the plain!
I think she's got it!
I think she's got it!
The rain in Spain stays mainly in the plain!
By George, she's got it!
By George, she's got it!
Now, once again where does it rain?
On the plain!
On the plain!
And where's that soggy plain?
In Spain!
In Spain!
Two Lay abouts = Zero
The leader of the worldwide cabal,the ultimate illuminati family or the race-card playing all time bitch of the USA. I pity Harry who could not have chosen a worse woman if he tried. Markle lies about everything. When her mouth is moving.... Seems the all too happy couple sold their story to netflix for a few million but the big bucks for these grifters is still to come.
Never have watched Oprah and probably never will.
#skinnyjewishgirlsmart
wish Frankel had kept it up...
1. Meghan claimed that her passport and license were taken away from her after she got married. How did she then goes to New York for a very expensive baby shower when she was pregnant as well as flying again to New York to watch Serena play tennis a few weeks after she delivered. She claims that she was not allowed to go out to have lunch with her friends but she was allowed to go to these event oversea without anyone preventing her from doing so
2. She claims that when she was going through depression that the palace did not help her. There was her obstetrician who is a medical doctor and doctors are trained to refer her to appropriate services if there was prenatal and post natal depression. She could also have made an appointments to see doctors on her own and there are palace doctors that she can arrange to see. I don’t see how anybody would have prevented her from seeing these doctors.
3. There was an insinuation that Archie was not given the title prince and HRH due to possibility of his skin colour. That is a total BS. The thing is Archie not given the royal title due to George V protocol and it is nothing to do with his skin colour. George V protocol states that only grandchildren of the Reigning Monarch is allowed to have HRH and prince title. Archie as great grandchildren is not eligible for title. only 3 of the 9 great grandkids of the Queen have a title.
4. There was also insinuation that Archie was not given protection due to his skin colour. Again, Meghan twisting things to suit her own agenda. Andrew’s 2 daughters do not get royal protection, neither do Princess Anne’s and Prince Edward’s children. It is not surprising that Harry’s children will not get royal protection either as he is not direct line to the throne.
5. I have difficulty believing Meghan because she has track record for lying repeatedly. A few examples include her lying in engagement interview that she does not know who Harry was and again in this interview that she never looked up the royal family. Firstly, she studied international studies at university for one of her majors and therefore, either that she was not a good student and cheated during the exam or she is lying about not knowing anything about the royal family and protocols. Secondly, she had Diana book in her library according to her childhood friend, blogged about Williams and Kate’s wedding on her now defunct Tig blog, was pictured with Kate’s magazine cover in her hand prior to meeting Harry and pictured in front of Buckingham palace as a teenager. She also lied about not collaborating with authors of finding Freedom book and paying for uni tuition herself when her father paid for them
Newsflash: most people are boring.
And whiny.
Useful idiots are rarely interesting.