Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: aquila48
1 in 100 years is hardly a short term solution.

The way to look at it is - imagine every year, you have jar with 99 red M&Ms and 1 green M&M. You pick 1 M&M. How long before you pick that green one?

In a previous job, I worked with a team building chemical-process plants, and were looking at a site, 1/100 year flood potential was the bare minimum, and that was for industry - not urban/housing/residential construction.

I’m not a hydrologist, but I have heard that when the Dutch build or repair their levees (to keep the Baltic Sea out) they look at a minimum of of 1/10,000 year event possibility.

17 posted on 03/03/2021 9:36:29 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: PGR88

“In a previous job, I worked with a team building chemical-process plants, and were looking at a site, 1/100 year flood potential was the bare minimum, and that was for industry - not urban/housing/residential construction.”

Agree, and the thing, what is 1/100 versus 1/1000 - actually very little difference? It might mean designing heating systems for 100 hours below freezing temperature with a minimum temperature of 10F, versus designing for 130 hours below freezing with a minimum temperature of 5F.

In other words, by the time you’ve designed for 1 in a 100 years, you’re generally 90% of the way to 1 in a 1000 years. Also keep in mind that good data likely doesn’t go back more than 100 years, as engines didn’t even have a written language (in most cases).


23 posted on 03/03/2021 11:24:43 AM PST by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson