Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: who_would_fardels_bear
The "nanoparticle" is the mRNA bit encased inside a lipid sack, for lack of a better term. The scientists who have developed this don't mind keeping people in the dark about it, leaving many to fear the worst.

I do not trust the scientists. They are saying it is a vaccine when it is actually gene therapy.

60 posted on 02/13/2021 9:23:31 PM PST by Slyfox (Not my circus, not my monkeys )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: Slyfox
Personally I'm going to avoid the vaccine as long as possible. Hopefully there will be a truly traditional vaccine that is a dead or weakened version of COVID.

Even if it doesn't really work, if it allows me to keep my job and travel then I will take it.

I am still a bit suspicious of the J&J as it uses an adenovirus with the spiky bit of COVID to fool antibodies into making antibodies for COVID, but I'd be happier taking that than the Moderna or Pfizer products.

Still everything is aborted fetus based so there's that moral quagmire, though I did find a list that details which treatments and upcoming vaccines are dead baby free.

I'm hoping that something entirely moral comes up before I need to think about early retirement in the concentration camp called California.

62 posted on 02/13/2021 9:27:52 PM PST by who_would_fardels_bear (This is not my current tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson