Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Steely Tom

This is 1/100 the magnitude, correct?


8 posted on 02/13/2021 7:46:10 AM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: EEGator

“This is 1/100 the magnitude, correct?“

Anybody who’s been in a 5-6 M earthquake will rightly fear a 7M.


16 posted on 02/13/2021 8:03:09 AM PST by VanShuyten ("...that all the donkeys were dead. I know nothing as to the fate of the less valuable animals.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: EEGator
This is 1/100 the magnitude, correct?

It's a bit more involved than that; it is logarithmic, but the base is somewhat ambiguous. The issue is whether the value one is taking the logarithm of is the maximum amplitude measured by seismographs, or the total energy released which of course must be estimated by more involved means and takes into account the depth of the fault failure and the area (or perhaps) volume over which the failure extended.

24 posted on 02/13/2021 8:25:22 AM PST by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: EEGator
This is 1/100 the magnitude, correct?

IIRC, it would be 1/1,000 the magnitude. (each rise of 1 level of magnitude is 32 x above the lower one, and 32x32=1,000)

25 posted on 02/13/2021 8:31:52 AM PST by Seaplaner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson