Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate votes Trump impeachment trial is constitutional
foxnews.com ^ | Feb. 9, 2021 | By Marisa Schultz

Posted on 02/09/2021 2:35:16 PM PST by PROCON

The Senate voted Tuesday to move ahead with the unprecedented impeachment trial of former President Trump after listening to hours of arguments on whether it is constitutional to try a president who is already out of office.

The vote was 56-44.

Trump's legal team said the trial is unconstitutional because he's no longer in office and can't face removal, which is the standard judgment of an impeachment conviction.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: censureromney; crossingtherubicon; farce; farce2; impeachment; impeachment2; rinos; senate; trump; unconstitutional
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 321-338 next last
To: P-Marlowe

It’s good to know that the only reason this is happening is because the dems and romney faction want to block Trump from running again in 2024.

If they need to fraud the vote again, then they will, so it doesn’t really matter if he runs. Cheaters cheat.


201 posted on 02/09/2021 5:20:50 PM PST by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Republican Party is dead!

There is no intellectual honesty. There is no backbone. There is no life left in the Republican Party.


202 posted on 02/09/2021 5:21:49 PM PST by Chgogal (Hey Biden, I am a loyal supporter of the Biden's Banana Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

“We heard arguments from both sides on the constitutionality of having a Senate trial of a president who has since left office. A sufficient amount of evidence of constitutionality exists for the Senate to proceed with the trial. This vote is not a prejudgment on the final vote to convict,” said Dr. Cassidy. “If anyone disagrees with my vote and would like an explanation, I ask them to listen to the arguments presented by the House Managers and former President Trump’s lawyers. The House managers had much stronger constitutional arguments. The president’s team did not.”

Bill Cassidy


203 posted on 02/09/2021 5:22:33 PM PST by mom.mom (...our flag was still there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

100% agree.

I would like to see the scotus rule on the constitutionality of impeaching a former president, though. These senate clowns don’t take the constitution any more seriously than I take sermons by Jethro Dollar or whatever his name is.


204 posted on 02/09/2021 5:23:13 PM PST by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

This is a sham.

How stupid.

I hate these people but what good does that do?


205 posted on 02/09/2021 5:23:56 PM PST by Sequoyah101 (I have a burning hatred of anyone who would vote for a demented, pedophile, crook and a commie whore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: myerson

50 dem senators and Kamala were going to vote yes no matter what the lawyers or rinos did.


206 posted on 02/09/2021 5:23:59 PM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Re-imagine the media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RetiredScientist

“No. A court decides if it is legal.”

Agreed. The fact that Roberts refused to preside speaks volumes.


207 posted on 02/09/2021 5:30:07 PM PST by redfreedom (You can vote your way into socialism, but you may have to shoot your way out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
is constitutionality not up to the USSC?
208 posted on 02/09/2021 5:30:43 PM PST by Chode (Ashli Babbitt - #SayHerNAME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

If Trumps lawyers were smart ( I’m beginning to doubt that) they would file an emergency writ with SCOTUS challenging the constitutionality of the vote by the senate. That would stop the trial in its tracks.


209 posted on 02/09/2021 5:31:37 PM PST by P-Marlowe (Freep mail me if you want to be on my Fingerstyle Acoustic Guitar Ping List )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Fawn

They can disallow him but I’ll still vote for him whether or not he is on the ballot, I’ll write him in. I’m not about to allow a bunch of criminal communist thugs take away my right to vote for a person I choose


210 posted on 02/09/2021 5:32:06 PM PST by GrandJediMasterYoda (As long as Hillary Clinton remains free equal justice under the law will never exist in the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

I’m sorry...help me out...and I’m sorry if this has already been stated.

How can the Senate vote on whether or not something is Constitutional? Isn’t that why we have a Supreme Court?


211 posted on 02/09/2021 5:33:08 PM PST by woweeitsme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DrHFrog
I kind of wish Trump would lose so he can appeal to the Supreme Court who should make it clear this whole exercise is a sham...

And you what the USSC will probably say? Trump doesn't have standing.....
212 posted on 02/09/2021 5:35:39 PM PST by Eagle of Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Skywise

Roberts has proven time and time again that he is a useless wimp. He needs to be pushed out.


213 posted on 02/09/2021 5:35:53 PM PST by AlphaOneAlpha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

That would be truly fun to watch.

But, no doubt in my mind. I’d love to see scotus decide the issue. How would we frame it? “Can a former president be tried in an impeachment trial, even if the impeachment was delivered before he left office?”

How would you put it?


214 posted on 02/09/2021 5:40:06 PM PST by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Skywise

If it’s so constitutional - where’s Roberts?


Robert’s role in an impeachment trial is limited to presiding over a sitting President. This is to avoid the obvious conflict of interest if the VP were to preside—especially under the original rules where the VP was the one who came in second in the Presidential election.

The Chief Justice plays no role in other impeachment trials and since President Trump is no longer in office, there is no need for the CJ to preside.


215 posted on 02/09/2021 5:41:37 PM PST by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: woweeitsme

The Rule of Law is no more, the Constitution is what these elected-criminals say it is.


216 posted on 02/09/2021 5:45:00 PM PST by PROCON (Molon Labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: xzins

They voted that what they are about to do is constitutional. That would allow for an immediate challenge to their vote. Just file an emergency writ. Trump clearly has standing now. And the need for an emergency hearing bears on his rights as a citizen. He is the target of a bill of attainder.

Just file it immediately. Don’t Even wait for the court to open. Slide it under the door. Then file for an injunction stopping the trial until the court rules on it.


217 posted on 02/09/2021 5:46:30 PM PST by P-Marlowe (Freep mail me if you want to be on my Fingerstyle Acoustic Guitar Ping List )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

What are the odds that they will go there?


218 posted on 02/09/2021 5:49:33 PM PST by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: unixfox
Remember, lying to Congress is a felony.

That's a real knee slapper right there? If lying to Congress is a felony 95% of the congress-critters are felons.

219 posted on 02/09/2021 5:50:10 PM PST by eeriegeno (A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

You can NOT vote to say something is constitutional....it either is or it is not.........in this case the latter is true


220 posted on 02/09/2021 5:50:49 PM PST by blueyon (`nt to be a nothing burger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 321-338 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson