Posted on 02/06/2021 7:27:03 AM PST by vharlow
Everyone should see this evidence that there definitely was foreign interference in the election. It’s long, but thorough.
Now everyone and every outfit involved in this documentary will be targeted too.
Bulls-eye on every conservative until the current regime is rendered illegitimate.
Thanks for posting.
I encourage all FReepers to forward the link to the video to their friends as Fake News Media is spiking any news about the video.
btt
So, in other words...
Any other day.
YouTube Deletes Mike Lindell’s Documentary “Absolute Proof”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7ouenN0GCs
I watched it last night. Lays it out very good. The election was stolen.
The media/left/libs/RINOs will dismiss it without even watching. You will not see them disputing any of the evidence. They will do their regular kill the messenger so no one will ever see the message.
I was able to watch the entire documentary. While portions of the film were repetitive (claims of election irregularities that many of us already were familiar with), it did contain new information on cyberattacks that were quite worthwhile.
The documentary reinforced my belief that the Dominion and Smartmatic lawsuits are not going to accomplish anything. My guess is that these lawsuits were both “slap suits.” The filings were intended to silence critics for fear of litigation costs rather than succeeding on the merits at trial.
With Newsmax gone, OAN is the last one standing.
Advertisers took control of Fox and now Newsmax.
Ping
We need others to watch it but it's unlikely that the unconvinced will invest the 2-3 hours required to see it and of course, the MSM and social media platforms is doing all they can to ensure that nobody even knows that something like this exists.
The New York Times is the only Fake News Media who has reported on Mike Lindell’s video. Of course, it is very negative. NONE of the other Fake News Media has reported on the video.
Three false claims about the election made in Mike Lindell’s new film.
The 2020 presidential election was three months ago, but one of the biggest backers of the false theory that it was rigged against former President Donald J. Trump has not given up his hope of overturning the results.
On Friday, Mike Lindell, the embattled chief executive of MyPillow who helped finance Mr. Trump’s legal efforts to challenge election results, aired a falsehood-laden film about election fraud on One America News.
The network promoted the two-hour film, titled “Absolute Proof,” on Twitter Thursday, urging viewers to join Mr. Lindell “for a never-before-seen report breaking down election fraud evidence & showing how the unprecedented level of voter fraud was committed in the 2020 Presidential Election.”
There has been no substantial evidence of fraud in the election, which President Biden won. Mr. Lindell’s theories have led to Twitter removing him and MyPillow from its platform and several major retailers cutting ties with the pillow manufacturer.
Before showing the film on Friday, the network ran an extensive disclaimer that described Mr. Lindell as “solely and exclusively responsible for its content,” and noted that “this program is not the product of OAN’s reporting” and was “presented at this time as opinions only.”
YouTube took down “Absolute Proof” on Friday, saying it violated the company’s presidential election integrity policy, which prohibits false claims that widespread fraud, errors or glitches changed the outcome of the vote.
Two companies that provide election technology, Dominion and Smartmatic, have filed defamation suits in recent weeks against people and organizations that have made baseless claims about the companies.
Here are three much-examined areas that come up in the film. One America and Mr. Lindell did not respond to requests for comment.
1. No, Dominion files were not manipulated.
The crux of many arguments that election fraud occurred, and repeated in Mr. Lindell’s film, is the unsubstantiated claim that Dominion software was somehow manipulated to delete votes for Mr. Trump, or to hide some sort of conspiracy.
Nearly 20 Million Americans Have a Felony Record. What Happens After They’ve Served Their Time?
Why We Can’t Stop Talking About Betty Friedan
Many of these unsubstantiated claims stem from an instance in Antrim County, Mich., when a clerical error in reporting results led the county to initially show a landslide vote in favor of Mr. Biden. The error was soon corrected, but conspiracy theorists have latched onto the incident as evidence that voting was rigged.
Files “were deleted from the Dominion system in Antrim County. We know that for a fact,” Matt DePerno, a lawyer who has fought to investigate the incident, told Mr. Lindell in the film. “Wow,” Mr. Lindell responded.
There has been no evidence that votes were manipulated in the county, and a hand-counted audit of votes in December affirmed the outcome there.
2. No, foreign countries did not interfere with voting machines.
Mr. Lindell interviewed retired Army Col. Phil Waldron, another member of the movement that fought to overturn the election. Mr. Waldron, who said his military background involves “information warfare,” pushed the unfounded claim that the Chinese government invested money in Dominion and therefore has access to its files and data.
“A lot of movements of votes, direct access to Pennsylvania voting precincts, county tabulation centers, Wisconsin, Michigan, Nevada, Arizona, Georgia, all of that coming directly from foreign countries, China being the predominant one,” Mr. Waldron said.
He also claimed that overseas servers in Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom somehow played a role in manipulating results. The manipulation, Mr. Waldron said, was “part of a coup that was aided and abetted by a foreign-threat nation-state, a peer enemy nation-state: China.”
Election officials and cybersecurity experts have said there is no credible evidence that China helped Mr. Biden win the election.
3. No, votes for Biden were not counted multiple times.
Melissa Carone, an information technology worker who said she was contracted by Dominion for the election, was brought on the show to tell Mr. Lindell that she watched thousands of ballots run through voting machines without ever seeing a single vote for Mr. Trump.
Ms. Carone, whose testimony was ruled “not credible” by a Michigan judge in November, told Mr. Lindell that when ballots jammed inside the machine, people tabulating the votes were re-scanning dozens of ballots and counting them twice.
“It’s like counting a deck of cards, you could sit there and run the same deck of cards through this tabulator over and over and over again,” Mr. Lindell observed.
Michigan election officials have said that ballots were “not scanned multiple times inappropriately.”
Ok so Mike’s video and all of the witnesses he has proves that the election was fraudulent. To quote the beast, “At this point what difference does it make?” Those horses have left the barn! It is useless to worry about the barn door now! What can be done about it now?
The data provided was absolutely damning.
“””The media/left/libs/RINOs will dismiss it without even watching.”””
The media/left/libs/RINOs are not even acknowledging the video exists.
I did a news search on BING and only the New York Times wrote a disparaging report on the video.
It was on OAN 08:10am this morning.. interesting.
The media/left/libs/RINOs are not even acknowledging the video exists.
Like the ultimate leader biden said they accept truth over facts.
I watched it on OANN this morning.
Has anyone found a commentary on Townhall and other conservative sites about the Mike Lindell video?
I am concerned Google and Big Tech may be excluding ‘Absolute Proof’ from search results.
Few causes of action are more ridiculous than ”defamation” (it’s actually subsumed under libel). This becomes even more absurd when plaintiff is a public figure. It would be difficult for the Castero-Chavez Voting Machine Company to try to argue that their president has not turned himself into a “public figure” via his own spectacular asininity.
Lawyers seldom take these cases, they’re simply unwinnable. You run into 1A problems, proof of economic damages (*but for* defendant’s false and malicious statements plaintiff would have earned $X from XXX. This info must be specific, and provable).
As a public figure, plaintiff has to prove *actual malice* on top of the elements of libel.
That said, a single libtard judge can cause a lot of trouble.
Plaintiffs are certainly rolling the dice, though. Discovery is not something they should want to experience. Potentially, everything could come in, if it actually goes to trial.
At the very least, there will be depositions.
I really can’t figure out what these lawyers are thinking. They had to know that Rudy would be deliriously happy at being served. If the point is to harass defendants, it’s already an epic fail. Is there some grand strategy at work that I’m not smart enough to understand?
Or are plaintiff’s lawyers just Avanetti Stupid?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.