New York Times Begs Court to Dismiss Project Veritas Defamation Lawsuit, Admits to Article Inaccuracies While Under Oath

projectveritas.com ^ | 1/26/2021 | projectveritas.com

[Fido969]

Her complaint about anonymous sources is bizarre.

The difference between Vertas’ anonymous sources and the NYT is that Veritas has real sources.

[eyeamok]

While arguing to dismiss the case, The New York Times’ legal team cited Wikipedia.

Wikipedia themselves admit that their website is not a reliable source of information.

In other words: THE LAWYER LIED TO THE COURT, and this is the Biggest problem in our Legal System we have, the Lawyer should have been Sanctioned on the Spot, found in Contempt of Court and JAILED.

[norwaypinesavage]

“Unverifiable expressions of opinion are not actionable and cannot be defamatory.”

Every word written in that rag is unverifiable expressions of opinion. The problem for the NYT, though, are that they pretend that they produce news. Since they purport to be news, and many fools believe them to be so, they are clearly guilty.

[Little Ray]

Why settle?
If Veritas has the money and lawyers, why not rake the Old Gray Whore over the coals AND take their money?

[Lod881019]

I kinda know that once this case doesn’t get tossed the attorneys for The NY Times are going to quickly want to settle or else have their little ring exposed in court

[Gay State Conservative]

later