To: NonValueAdded
If they want to go with the whole “he was President when he was impeached by the House” argument, then for this trial, would he not also be considered President and therefore, the chief justice should preside? If they’re now stating he’s a private citizen and since the chief justice won’t preside, they can appoint someone, well... the senate doesn’t have the authority to try private citizens. I don’t see how, by any logic, this is constitutional.
To: grateful
This is entering the realm of 3D chess. As a tactical move, xPDJT could file a Writ of Mandamus request with SCOTUS asserting the "Impeached as President, then tried as President" idea and seek to compel Roberts to preside as is Constitutionally required. Otherwise, Roberts would be impeachable! Either way, Yamamoto!
149 posted on
01/25/2021 11:48:52 AM PST by
NonValueAdded
(Killer Joe: babies, jobs, tax cuts, he kills them all.)
To: grateful
Facts. Logic. Reason.
Why do you mention these things citizen? Revolutionaries act, they don't think.
184 posted on
01/25/2021 2:34:42 PM PST by
Former Proud Canadian
(Islam---At war with Western Civilization for 1400 years)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson