Posted on 01/24/2021 12:38:59 PM PST by DEPcom
The students are getting more legal education in a zoom meeting with Lin Wood than I’m sure they have received since classes started last semester.
“It made Cathy Cox’s previous remarks seem petty and pandering to the law students who were in on the call.”
I did listen to it all. Cathey Cox’s remarks to others in the Zoom meeting were slanderous, claiming Wood has mentally declined, calling Wood’s sanity into question (not knowing Wood was listening).
Of course, to leftists, finding God (as Lin explained in this video that he did a year and a half ago) means you’re insane. Seems some in his family agree, too.
We’re in Satan’s times, in a war against evil and Satan’s many minions. Wood us a huge target.
“do you people read the ridiculous crap you write?”
Maybe you should read this:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3928396/posts
You obviously did not listen to the zoom call. Thank you for playing with a few cards missing.
Keep your mother out of this.
I am fairly certain “Dean” is her title—she is the Dean of the law school...
That is the consensus here... you are a retard.
The left hates humor and is trying to stamp it out.
Even here at FR.
You are a buffoon.
Oh you are so smart John, I just don’t know how I ever managed to survive on this forum without access to your superior wisdom.
I’ve had fun reading the emails about you that I’ve been getting about you, seems like everyone recognizes you for what you are.
the fbi is utterly uninterested in my humanitarian recommendation that wood’s supporters seek counseling.
This is excellent.
The only thing that would make this vid better would be being able to see the (zoom) faces of these people....especially when Lin first comes onto the call.
Dean Cathy, “Oh, is Lin on this call?”
Lin, “Yes, I am.”
Bwahahahaha.
Thank you for posting.
You might be right..... he suddenly presented with the televangelist shtick and it seemed pretty weird.
My main problem with Lin is that he lacked perspective on his stated goal and it appears he promoted himself more than the goal (challenge the election) when it was the wrong move tactically. When everyone ignores everything you first have to get something to stick.
Lin, Sidney, and others sucked all the air out of the room. Would it have made a difference? I don’t know and likely not.... the fraud and unconstitutionality of it all was supported by all institutions and much of the GOPe.
However, even assuming he is correct about some of his outlandish claims (I don’t buy some of them, but think others are worth investigation), it was bad messaging because he made himself (not the message - he, Lin Wood) the face of the “challenge” AND he put out a lot of smoke on stuff that would take months or years to prove. We did not have that amount of time.
Beginning in late November, the Trump campaign lawyers, armed with very real evidence that was easy to understand and show, severed ties with Lin and Sidney.
Why?
Because they realized that they need to focus on what they could prove and the things that would sway public opinion.
The damage was done. They never got traction for the stuff that even I can explain to a skeptical person. Even here on FR, much of what was posted was not relevant to the task at hand. Things that frankly appear to be crazy with no basis in reality such as Frankfurt, Spain, Italy, John Roberts and Epstein, etc etc etc. Booms, bombshells, and red sirens all over the place.
It sucked all the air out of the room. Courts require focus and cases are more likely to succeed when they are narrow in scope dealing with a specific thing. The shotgun approach rarely prevails in even an unbiased court.
Lin shot off his mouth about some crazy stuff. I think many of us started wondering about him and he did nothing to assure us - it got worse. If people don’t like John Roberts that is fine. I am upset with his decisions as well from a constitutional standpoint and I do believe he is considering reactions from the swamp equally with the constitution. However, accusing the man of being a pedophile is ridiculous. These kind of stories are typically one blogger citing another blogger or Alex Jones or other such sources and then in the rush to generate clickbait it is plastered all over and lots of people suddenly believe it to be true absent any proof. How many of these did not pan out?
We live in strange times. Peter Navarro wrote the best roadmap to understanding what happened in the election. We never needed all the movie script stuff and still don’t. It’s all right there. It is irrefutable and unprecedented.
It is why there has been no in-depth analysis of the Presidential election. Something that often occupied the media for months after election day throughout my lifetime.
Zip. Nada. Why? Because they know it does not stand up. They know that the numbers from Cleveland and Cincinnati are historically good prognosticators of what happens in Detroit or Philly. They know bellweather counties are 98% accurate. Not this year. They know that using the average percentage of disqualifying questionable ballots was enough to change the election result, but not this time.
They know enthusiasm of the base indicates the winner. They KNOW that many democrat voters supported Trump. They know there was little enthusiasm for Biden who ran the weakest campaign in my lifetime, yet here we are.
The mantra that "there was no evidence there was election fraud of the magnitude that would have overturned the election" was a political and media disinformation campaign. It was never possible to gather such evidence in a short timeframe. Nothing more than gaslighting and steamrolling of the American voter; now we have a fraudulent President.
Lin filed two lawsuits regarding the legality of the SOS making the rules for the election instead of the legislature.
On these, he was 100% correct. However, while I am not a lawyer, I am pretty sure calling the Chief Justice of SCOTUS and every judge in between everything from a pedophile to corrupt is probably not the best legal strategy to advance your case to throw out fraudulent ballots, an unconstitutional process, and the results.
Surely you can agree with that?
Bumping for later.
Lin Wood sounded credible, but he should long ago have posted his whistleblower's evidence to a website. America is sick of all the "soon to be revealed!" nonsense.
Mercer Law School has some loud, rude, narrow minded students. Lin Wood had nothing to do with the Capitol riot.
Dean Cox is a backstabber who is surprised that backstabbing has consequences. Cox should have apologized for not contacting Wood before making accusations against him. She should have told Wood that of course his $500K donation would be returned, and the courtroom would be named for someone else.
“ I will say without reservation that Lin Wood ripped a new posterior orifice on Cathy Cox and her school. He dealt with Brandon’s question in a masterful way. “
Ditto.
~Easy
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.