Posted on 01/23/2021 7:57:04 AM PST by RBW in PA
Watch this video, its long but very informative. Dr. Simone presents the facts about;
1) Covid Morbidity
2) Hydroxychloroquine
3) The "Experimental Vaccines
4) Unknown and serious side effects
5) Pharmaceutical Companies Immunity
6) Race with respect to the virus
7) Upcoming travel bans for people who are not inoculated
Dr Simone Gold -Stop Medical Discrimination
After watching this you will not want the so called vaccines.
Please share this, it was already taken down once.
Doctor Fauxchee will be having her shut down. In a cooperative, decent, unifying manner of course. FactCheckers Local 101 is on the job!
More nonsense from “America’s Frontline Doctors”, which is a group of conspiracy theory pushing kooks.
Claims made by this particular kook have already been shown to be false by others, so rather than addressing them individually, I’ll leave a link to someone who already did that: https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-vaccine-idUSKBN29Q302
We should remember that the vaccines and HCQ and Ivermectin for CoVId-19 all share the same status, not certified for use by the CDC, but no longer withheld from use either. This is for both the vaccines and the prophylactic treatment.
Thank you for posting the Reuters link. I don’t know much about “Frontline Doctors”, but Dr. Golds presentation is compelling. I have to ask, why do you think Reuters or any other MSM outlet is more credible then her? Personally, I trust nothing from the MSM.
Don't bother to follow the link to an undated 'FactCheck' from Reuters, a member of the globalist press. For Ivermectin it seems to still point to a study where the dosage was way too high and bunged the results, and has since been recalled.
Now here's a study that is dated and current - India study
Dr. Gold was involved in the January 6th protest at the US Capitol and has been arrested by the FBI. This was being reported yesterday. Has anyone seen any further updated information?
I watched this.
It is fascinating and well worth the time.
Probably best to put it on and listen to it while you’re doing chores or something.
Still shilling for pharma, eh?
How much are they paying you to come on FR and shill for them?
Reuters is not an outlet I would trust on its own anymore than I would trust any MSM source or politician. I read the actual article and that one particular article is accurate. The next article I read from them will probably be garbage. I take each source individually to verify the information. My trusted sources for things involving science are the published, peer reviewed scientific papers, studies, and literature reviews.
Why post it? Because that particular article did the work I’d have otherwise had to do myself.
The vaccines ARE safe. They were proven safe in Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 clinical trials performed throughout last year with over 100,000 people. And now more than 60 million people worldwide (including 20 million people in the US) have gotten the vaccines and they’re fine.
COVID-19 has a 0.65% Infection Fatality Rate. If we gave 60 million people COVID-19, we’d have 390,000 dead. Me? I’m on the side of saving lives. The vaccines are doing so.
Reuters? What a joke. FBI had her on “Most Wanted” list and arrested her. By now we’ve seen videos of barriers being moved to let protesters in. This was an operation, Designed to entrap people like Dr Gold to make an example of.
Still choosing disease over human life, eh?
"How much are they paying you to come on FR and shill for them?"
Not NEARLY enough. In fact, still waiting on that first paycheck. Every day I go to the mailbox and look for my "pharma shill check".
Prove the vaccine even works.
And for a disease that has a 99%+ survival rate?
You want to cut the death rate for this virus?
Allow prophylactic treatment and keep sick people out of nursing homes.
We don’t need a vaccine for a disease that is easily treatable and not so lethal.
It’s just a big money making scam for the pharma industry that is already screwing people over on medication costs anyways.
Did you even listen to her presentation?
And if you did, please address her points one at a time and demonstrate why she’s wrong.
Why don't you give the fatality rate from the vaccinations? Why don't you give the change of PCR sample that changed with Resident Bidet's ingratiation? That alone will drop the number of 'infected' persons to make it look like Bidet did something that was effective against the virus.
There isn't enough evidence collected and presented to state that as a fact.
Nor has it been out long enough or used widely enough to make that determination for sure. It's been months, not years, or decades.
How much are they paying you again to push a new, experimental vaccine on unsuspecting guinea pigs?
Okay. Here's the data for Pfizer and here's the data for Moderna. Their Phase 3 clinical trial results show both have an efficacy about 95%. Few vaccines in history have been any better than that. The smallpox vaccine was 95% effective. How's smallpox doing these days?
You want to cut the death rate for this virus?
You don't? What do you want to do with the death rate? INCREASE it?
0.65% of 330 million people is 2,145,000. Maybe you don't care. I do.
"And if you did, please address her points one at a time and demonstrate why she’s wrong."
The Reuters article I already posted did all that already. This kook is wrong and demonstrably so. In the end, it won't matter what I say or she says or you say: reality is reality. And the reality is already demonstrating that the vaccines are safe and effective, so COVID-19 is going away soon thanks to President Trump's work in Operation Warp Speed. His work brought us safe and effective vaccines quicker than any other vaccine program in history.
It's 0. 0%. About 11 per 1 million (0.001%) have a serious allergic reaction with the Pfizer vaccine, but those are rapidly reversed the same way you reverse any allergic reaction. The Moderna vaccine shows a serious allergic reaction in about 2 per 1 million (0.0002%). Meanwhile, COVID-19 hospitalizes 5% of those infected with it, sends 3% to the ICU, and kills 0.65%. So all in all? The vaccine is a better bet, just by the numbers.
"Why don't you give the change of PCR sample that changed with Resident Bidet's ingratiation?"
I understand what you were trying to ask here, but what you said doesn't really make any sense. What changed was the World Health Organization's guidance on diagnosis for COVID-19. But that doesn't matter since the WHO doesn't set case diagnostic definitions for the United States. The CDC does. CDC guidance on case definitions for COVID-19 have not changed since March.
Fewer fatalities?
Important observations
The study findings reveal that about 23% of patients receiving ivermectin and 31% of patients receiving placebo drug tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on day 6 of admission. This indicates that ivermectin is not effective in speeding up the viral clearance process. However, the scientists have mentioned that further studies are required to get a comprehensive information on viral clearance, because serial PCR tests have not been conducted in the current study. Moreover, conclusive PCR reports could not be achieved in 32% of patients.
In addition, no significant differences in symptomatic status, hospital discharge status, ICU admission, and need for mechanical ventilation have been observed between the ivermectin-treated and placebo-treated groups.
Although ivermectin fails to show any added benefit over the placebo medicine, no in-hospital mortality has been observed in the ivermectin-treated group; whereas, 4 patients in the placebo-treated group have died during their hospital stay. Taken together, these findings indicate that ivermectin has the potential to improve the in-hospital survival rate of patients with mild or moderate form of COVID-19.
In line with the current study findings, previous studies have shown that treatment of COVID-19 patients with ivermectin and doxycycline effectively reduces the in-hospital mortality rate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.