Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Campion

“I thought so, too, but that is not true.

Article I, Section 3:
Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States; but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.”

Due process.

Alcee Hastings aka “Corruption wearing shoes” was removed from the bench by impeachment.

However since he was not convicted by a court of law he could not be disqualified from office.

Which is why he held office in the US House after being impeached and convicted.

A not guilty judgement by a federal court would obviate any disqualification imposed by congress.


80 posted on 01/14/2021 1:55:57 PM PST by hank ernade (armchair macho bravado EverTrumper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: hank ernade
Alcee Hastings was convicted and removed from office, but not disqualified.

Thomas Porteous, a federal judge from Louisiana, was convicted in 2010 on 4 counts, removed from office, and disqualified from Federal office by a Senate vote of 94-2.

Look it up.

83 posted on 01/14/2021 2:20:34 PM PST by Campion (What part of "shall not be infringed" don't they understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson