He is correct in a sense, he could easily hear the objections, then decide there is too much Controversy to be decided by the Chair, and Send it to the House to Vote.
He is correct in a sense, he could easily hear the objections, then decide there is too much Controversy to be decided by the Chair, and Send it to the House to Vote.
___
Finally a reasonable reply instead of hyperbole. Where in the constitution does he get this option from?
That sounds like a fair way to get around this restriction.
Better to refer the issue to the Supreme Court first. Force the cowards to get off their knees and make the call. If the Court balks the House option is still available. Of course it’ll take time...