Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe

You’re having problems with this, so let’s try this way.

Imagine we are back in 2000, Al Gore is presiding over the electoral vote on 1-6-2001.

Does he have the authority to refuse Florida’s 29 electors?


46 posted on 01/05/2021 12:31:24 PM PST by mquinn (Obama's supporters: a deliberate drowning of consciousness by means of rhythmic noise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: mquinn

You’re having problems with this because you are comparing apples to oranges, so let’s try this way.

Back then, Gore lost because the USSC supported Florida following the electoral process established by their state legislator.

That is constitutional.

In 2020, several states changed their electoral processes not through their state legislators but through their Secretaries of State and through their Governors. Their Marxist courts upheld the UNCONSTITUTIONAL changes to the electoral process.

Fast forward to Jan. 6.

Judas Pence had all constitutional authority to send back the electoral votes from those states that had requested as much because the state legislators were reporting that the votes were flawed.

Both cases WOULD HAVE BEEN constitutional.

That’s comparing apples to apples.

Enjoy your snack.


59 posted on 01/06/2021 3:21:32 PM PST by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Prepare to survive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson