An alternative theory would be that the steal was accomplished using strictly lo-tech methods. Under this theory all the high tech theories are a diversion to get people to look away from old fashioned ballot stuffing.
I thought of this after looking at the famous video from Fulton County of the ballots being pulled from under the table. In my opinion those were probably valid ballots... they were segregated Biden ballots with a few Trump ones thrown in to make it look all kosher. After the famous incident of asking the observers to leave as counting was done for the night, they pulled those out and then counted them over and over again. There is some video of one of the persons doing just that. I wish Giuliani would release more of the video from that time segment.
I don’t mean to imply that Lin Wood and Sidney Powell are purposely running a diversion scam, just saying we should apply Occam’s razor and look for the simplest explanation.
I think multiple types were used - high tech and low.
But low tech is easier to prove and understand. (Dead people can’t vote, teens age 16-17 can’t vote, signatures don’t match, mail-in ballots don’t have creases, etc.)
“I don’t mean to imply that Lin Wood and Sidney Powell are purposely running a diversion scam, just saying we should apply Occam’s razor and look for the simplest explanation.”
I’ve had a variation of the same thought.
I think the Dominion counting machines were just as big a part of the “steal”, but too technical for the general public to understand.
The public needs to be awakened to this fraud in order for enough pressure to be brought to bear on politicians to demand justice. For that reason, I believe the focus right now should be on illegal ballot stuffing, not software data manipulation.
But having said that, the software data manipulation is a huge part of the racket - and essential to any criminal prosecution that comes as a result.
In order to understand the role of the Dominion machines - it is helpful to use the analogy of money laundering. In a grand theft, the proof of the theft is the money - just as the proof of a murder is the body.
Money laundering is a process whereby clean money with no forensic evidence of the crime, is substituted for the dirty money. Once that is done, the criminal can be caught with the money and yet escape consequences - since it can’t be proven that it was the same money that was stolen. The amount can match, the timing can match, but there are no fingerprints, serial numbers, etc.. to prove possession of stolen money.
I believe the election fraud, the illegal ballot stuffing was the actual theft, and the data software manipulation was the “laundering”.
In order to enter the physical ballots into the machines to be scanned and counted, they must be separated from their envelopes, which have the names, signatures, addresses, postmarks and other evidence of validity. The physical ballots are kept but can never be matched to their original envelopes - thus destroying the audit trail. It is impossible to recheck whether a ballot was valid.
As with the money, you can prove 300,000 ballots were not valid, but you can’t know which ones they were!
The machines serve as a laundering operation for stolen votes.
And that tabulators do not count by whole numbers, but by fractions.
“An alternative theory would be that the steal was accomplished using strictly lo-tech methods.”
From what I’ve seen, it seems that both methods were used successfully.