Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MayflowerMadam

“From what I’ve seen, it seems that both methods were used successfully.”

I shouldn’t have used the phrase ‘strictly lo-tech.’.. Obviously they threw everything at the wall in terms of ‘cheating.’ What I was trying to convey was agreement with Rand Paul that this election was taken with four data dumps in four cities: Detroit, Milwaukee, Philadelphia and Atlanta - if not for those four spikes, Trump would have won handily. I believe those four spikes were due to activity just like we see in the Fulton tape... Biden votes segregated, placed away for convenience and then ran through the tabulators multiple times... I further believe that if we had concentrated on just that aspect we would have had a better chance of success overturning the fraudulent results.


28 posted on 12/25/2020 3:32:35 PM PST by shadowlands1960 (“Some day you will be old enough to start reading fairy tales again.” CSL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: shadowlands1960

The one method that bugs me is a combo of basic ballot stuffing and high-tech. Hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots appear in one load. They aren’t folded and they’re in consecutive numerical order. They’d have to have been folded to fit in a mail-in envelope, and these weren’t. And what kind of statistical magic would have to occur to have thousands of ballots returned in consecutive numerical order? They come in randomly if they’re legit.

Then the virgin, unfolded ballots are fed through a voting machine — more than once in some instances.


29 posted on 12/25/2020 3:41:59 PM PST by MayflowerMadam ("Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free" Galatians 5:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson